Literature DB >> 19066971

Solitary invasive orchid bee outperforms co-occurring native bees to promote fruit set of an invasive Solanum.

Hong Liu1, Robert W Pemberton.   

Abstract

Our understanding of the effects of introduced invasive pollinators on plants has been exclusively drawn from studies on introduced social bees. One might expect, however, that the impacts of introduced solitary bees, with much lower population densities and fewer foragers, would be small. Yet little is known about the potential effects of naturalized solitary bees on the environment. We took advantage of the recent naturalization of an orchid bee, Euglossa viridissima, in southern Florida to study the effects of this solitary bee on reproduction of Solanum torvum, an invasive shrub. Flowers of S. torvum require specialized buzz pollination. Through timed floral visitor watches and two pollination treatments (control and pollen supplementation) at three forest edge and three open area sites, we found that the fruit set of S. torvum was pollen limited at the open sites where the native bees dominate, but was not pollen limited at the forest sites where the invasive orchid bees dominate. The orchid bee's pollination efficiency was nearly double that of the native halictid bees, and was also slightly higher than that of the native carpenter bee. Experiments using small and large mesh cages (to deny or allow E. viridissima access, respectively) at one forest site indicated that when the orchid bee was excluded, the flowers set one-quarter as many fruit as when the bee was allowed access. The orchid bee was the most important pollinator of the weed at the forest sites, which could pose additional challenges to the management of this weed in the fragmented, endangered tropical hardwood forests in the region. This specialized invasive mutualism may promote populations of both the orchid bee and this noxious weed. Invasive solitary bees, particularly species that are specialized pollinators, appear to have more importance than has previously been recognized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19066971     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1232-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

Review 1.  Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms.

Authors:  Anna Traveset; David M Richardson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant.

Authors:  M J Groom
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Orchid bees don't need orchids: evidence from the naturalization of an orchid bee in Florida.

Authors:  Robert W Pemberton; Gregory S Wheeler
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Pollination effectiveness and pollinator importance in a population of Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Kenneth M Olsen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Competitive interactions between neotropical pollinators and africanized honey bees.

Authors:  D W Roubik
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Reproduction and survival of a solitary bee along native and exotic floral resource gradients.

Authors:  Jennifer D Palladini; John L Maron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Intraspecific geographic variation of fragrances acquired by orchid bees in native and introduced populations.

Authors:  Santiago R Ramírez; Thomas Eltz; Falko Fritzsch; Robert Pemberton; Elizabeth G Pringle; Neil D Tsutsui
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Small-scale environmental variation influences whether coral-dwelling fish promote or impede coral growth.

Authors:  T J Chase; M S Pratchett; S P W Walker; M O Hoogenboom
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Indirect effects of species interactions on habitat provisioning.

Authors:  Sally J Holbrook; Russell J Schmitt; Andrew J Brooks
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Positive and Negative Impacts of Non-Native Bee Species around the World.

Authors:  Laura Russo
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Does the morphological fit between flowers and pollinators affect pollen deposition? An experimental test in a buzz-pollinated species with anther dimorphism.

Authors:  Lislie Solís-Montero; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Along urbanization sprawl, exotic plants distort native bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) assemblages in high elevation Andes ecosystem.

Authors:  Patricia Henríquez-Piskulich; Alejandro Vera; Gino Sandoval; Cristian Villagra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Buzz-Pollinated Crops: A Global Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Supplemental Bee Pollination in Tomato.

Authors:  Hazel Cooley; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.381

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.