BACKGROUND: Early risk stratification is important in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). OBJECTIVE: To develop a rapidly available risk stratification tool for use in all ACS. DESIGN AND METHODS: Application of modern data mining and machine learning algorithms to a derivation cohort of 7520 ACS patients included in the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland)-Plus registry between 2001 and 2005; prospective model testing in two validation cohorts. RESULTS: The most accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality was achieved with the "Averaged One-Dependence Estimators" (AODE) algorithm, with input of seven variables available at first patient contact: age, Killip class, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, history of heart failure, history of cerebrovascular disease. The c-statistic for the derivation cohort (0.875) was essentially maintained in important subgroups, and calibration over five risk categories, ranging from <1% to >30% predicted mortality, was accurate. Results were validated prospectively against an independent AMIS-Plus cohort (n = 2854, c-statistic 0.868) and the Krakow-Region ACS Registry (n = 2635, c-statistic 0.842). The AMIS model significantly outperformed established "point-of-care" risk-prediction tools in both validation cohorts. In comparison to a logistic regression-based model, the AODE-based model proved to be more robust when tested on the Krakow validation cohort (c-statistic 0.842 vs 0.746). Accuracy of the AMIS model prediction was maintained at 12-month follow-up in an independent cohort (n = 1972, c-statistic 0.877). CONCLUSIONS: The AMIS model is a reproducibly accurate point-of-care risk stratification tool for the complete range of ACS, based on variables available at first patient contact.
BACKGROUND: Early risk stratification is important in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). OBJECTIVE: To develop a rapidly available risk stratification tool for use in all ACS. DESIGN AND METHODS: Application of modern data mining and machine learning algorithms to a derivation cohort of 7520 ACS patients included in the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland)-Plus registry between 2001 and 2005; prospective model testing in two validation cohorts. RESULTS: The most accurate prediction of in-hospital mortality was achieved with the "Averaged One-Dependence Estimators" (AODE) algorithm, with input of seven variables available at first patient contact: age, Killip class, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, history of heart failure, history of cerebrovascular disease. The c-statistic for the derivation cohort (0.875) was essentially maintained in important subgroups, and calibration over five risk categories, ranging from <1% to >30% predicted mortality, was accurate. Results were validated prospectively against an independent AMIS-Plus cohort (n = 2854, c-statistic 0.868) and the Krakow-Region ACS Registry (n = 2635, c-statistic 0.842). The AMIS model significantly outperformed established "point-of-care" risk-prediction tools in both validation cohorts. In comparison to a logistic regression-based model, the AODE-based model proved to be more robust when tested on the Krakow validation cohort (c-statistic 0.842 vs 0.746). Accuracy of the AMIS model prediction was maintained at 12-month follow-up in an independent cohort (n = 1972, c-statistic 0.877). CONCLUSIONS: The AMIS model is a reproducibly accurate point-of-care risk stratification tool for the complete range of ACS, based on variables available at first patient contact.
Authors: Lulu Li; Xiling Zhang; Yini Wang; Xi Yu; Haibo Jia; Jingbo Hou; Chunjie Li; Wenjuan Zhang; Wei Yang; Bin Liu; Lixin Lu; Ning Tan; Bo Yu; Kang Li Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-04-07
Authors: Keith A A Fox; Gordon Fitzgerald; Etienne Puymirat; Wei Huang; Kathryn Carruthers; Tabassome Simon; Pierre Coste; Jacques Monsegu; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Nicolas Danchin; Fred Anderson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Franz Ratzinger; Michel Dedeyan; Matthias Rammerstorfer; Thomas Perkmann; Heinz Burgmann; Athanasios Makristathis; Georg Dorffner; Felix Lötsch; Alexander Blacky; Michael Ramharter Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 3.240