Literature DB >> 19065484

Histopathology of Barrett's esophagus after ablation and endoscopic mucosal resection therapy.

R D Odze1, G Y Lauwers.   

Abstract

This review focuses on the histopathological evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) specimens in Barrett's esophagus, and on the histopathological, biological, and molecular properties of postablation Barrett's esophagus. EMR may be used for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Diagnostic accuracy regarding the grade and stage of neoplasms is improved with the use of EMR, but the value of this technique for treatment is more controversial because of the high prevalence rate of positive margins and the rate of metachronous lesions found elsewhere in the esophagus during follow-up. Ablation techniques, such as argon plasma coagulation, photodynamic therapy, and radiofrequency ablation, are used increasingly for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus and related neoplasms, often in combination with EMR. A common problem after use of these techniques is the development of islands of neosquamous epithelium (NSE) which can overlie buried Barrett's (and/or dysplasia) epithelium. This is, therefore, concealed to the endoscopist's view and may be allowed to progress to cancer without detection. NSE is histologically similar to normal esophageal squamous epithelium and does not possess the molecular aberrations characteristic of Barrett's esophagus. In contrast, residual nonburied Barrett's esophagus shows persistent pathologic and molecular abnormalities and may progress to cancer upon long term follow-up. The biological potential and rate of progression of nonburied residual Barrett's esophagus following ablation is unclear, but some preliminary studies suggest that the risk may decrease. Buried nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus appears to show decreased biological potential and this may be related to protection from the contents of the lumen by the barrier function of the overlying NSE. On the other hand, anecdotal reports have suggested that buried dysplasia may progress to cancer in some instances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19065484     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  19 in total

1.  Radiofrequency ablation for dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus restores β-catenin activation within esophageal progenitor cells.

Authors:  K Krishnan; S Komanduri; J Cluley; R Dirisina; P Sinh; Jeff Z Ko; L Li; R B Katzman; T A Barrett
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Label-free multi-photon imaging of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Soroush Mehravar; Bhaskar Banerjee; Hemant Chatrath; Babak Amirsolaimani; Krunal Patel; Charmi Patel; Robert A Norwood; Nasser Peyghambarian; Khanh Kieu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Comparison of COX-2, Ki-67, and BCL-2 expression in normal esophageal mucosa, Barrett's esophagus, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma with postablation mucosa and implications for ablative therapies.

Authors:  Christopher John Lewis; Sri Ganeshamurthy Thrumurthy; Susan Pritchard; Gordon Armstrong; Stephen Edwin Arthur Attwood
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Biopsy depth after radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Anne F Peery; Bergein F Overholt; Charles J Lightdale; Amitabh Chak; Kenneth K Wang; Robert H Hawes; David E Fleischer; John R Goldblum
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Post-ablation surveillance in Barrett's esophagus: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Matthew W Stier; Vani J Konda; John Hart; Irving Waxman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Post-ablation lymphocytic esophagitis in Barrett esophagus with high grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma.

Authors:  Juliana Kissiedu; Prashanthi N Thota; Tushar Gohel; Rocio Lopez; Ilyssa O Gordon
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of esophageal neoplasia: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Vikneswaran Namasivayam; Kenneth K Wang; Ganapathy A Prasad
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Nrf2 deficiency impairs the barrier function of mouse oesophageal epithelium.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Yuhui Hu; Yu Fang; Zorka Djukic; Masayuki Yamamoto; Nicholas J Shaheen; Roy C Orlando; Xiaoxin Chen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of Barrett's esophagus detects high prevalence of subsquamous intestinal metaplasia.

Authors:  Patrick Yachimski; Chanjuan Shi; James C Slaughter; Mary Kay Washington
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-12-16

10.  Structural markers observed with endoscopic 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography correlating with Barrett's esophagus radiofrequency ablation treatment response (with videos).

Authors:  Tsung-Han Tsai; Chao Zhou; Yuankai K Tao; Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Osman O Ahsen; Marisa Figueiredo; Tejas Kirtane; Desmond C Adler; Joseph M Schmitt; Qin Huang; James G Fujimoto; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 9.427

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.