Literature DB >> 19065392

Female genital mutilation: an injury, physical and mental harm.

I Utz-Billing1, H Kentenich.   

Abstract

This article gives an overview over the huge topic of 'female genital mutilation' (FGM). FGM means non-therapeutic, partial or complete removal or injury of each of the external female genitals. It concerns about 130 million women around the world. FGM is performed in about 30 countries, most of which are located in Africa. Four types of FGM are distinguished: type I stands for the removal of the clitoral foreskin, type II means the removal of the clitoris with partial or total excision of the labia minora. Type III is the extreme type of FGM. Not only the clitoris but also the labia minora and majora were removed. The orificium vaginae is sewn up, leaving only a small opening for urine or menstruation blood. Other types like pricking, piercing of clitoris or vulva, scraping of the vagina, etc. were defined as type IV of FGM. The mentioned reasons for FGM are: encouragement of the patriarchal family system, method for birth control, guarantee of moral behaviour and faithfulness to the husband, protection of women from suspicions and disgrace, initiation ritual, symbol of feminity and beauty, hygienic, health and economic advantages. Acute physical consequences of FGM include bleeding, wound infections, sepsis, shock, micturition problems and fractures. Chronic physical problems like anemia, infections of the urinary tract, incontinence, infertility, pain, menstruation problems and dyspareunia are frequent. Women also have a higher risk for HIV infections. During pregnancy and delivery, examinations and vaginal application of medicine are more difficult. Women have a higher risk for a prolonged delivery, wound infections, a postpartum blood loss of more than 500 mL, perineal tears, a resuscitation of the infant and an inpatient perinatal death. Mental consequences after FGM include the feelings of incompleteness, fear, inferiority and suppression. Women report chronic irritability and nightmares. They have a higher risk for psychiatric and psychosomatic diseases. FGM carried out by doctors, nurses or midwives is also called medicalisation of FGM and is definitely unacceptable. Regarding human rights, FGM refuses women the right of freedom from bodily harm. Specific laws that ban FGM exist in many countries in Europe, Africa, USA, Canada, New Zealand and Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19065392     DOI: 10.1080/01674820802547087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0167-482X            Impact factor:   2.949


  21 in total

1.  Female genital circumcision/mutilation: implications for female urogynaecological health.

Authors:  Katharina Teufel; Daniela Marianne Dörfler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Female Genital Mutilation in Rural Regions of Iraqi Kurdistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Deldar Morad Abdulah; Bewar Abdulaziz Sedo; Angela Dawson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Penetrating injury of the vagina, bladder and omentum in a woman with 5 months gestation: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Qiang Liu; Bo-Jun Li; Gang Bi; Ping Yi; Ke Li; Yong Zhang; Ke-Qin Zhang; Yan-Feng Li
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Exploring female genital cutting among west African immigrants.

Authors:  Adeyinka M Akinsulure-Smith
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

5.  Consideration of Cultural Practices When Characterizing the Vaginal Microbiota Among African and African American Women.

Authors:  Etienne Nsereko; Patricia J Moreland; Anne L Dunlop; Manase Nzayirambaho; Elizabeth J Corwin
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.522

6.  Mental health problems associated with female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Jeroen Knipscheer; Erick Vloeberghs; Anke van der Kwaak; Maria van den Muijsenbergh
Journal:  BJPsych Bull       Date:  2015-12

7.  Female Genital Mutilation in Ghana: Prevalence and Socioeconomic Predictors.

Authors:  Abdul Rauf Alhassan; John Nyaaba Anyinzaam-Adolipore
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  NOTES. Study on patients' perspective.

Authors:  Jarek Kobiela; Tomasz Stefaniak; Dariusz Laski; Malgorzata Mackowiak; Alicja Czurylo; Stanislaw Hac; Andrzej J Lachinski; Zbigniew Sledzinski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Female circumcision: Limiting the harm.

Authors:  Mohamed Kandil
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2012-10-05

10.  Crossing borders: discussing the evidence relating to the mental health needs of women exposed to female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Peggy Mulongo; Sue McAndrew; Caroline Hollins Martin
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.