Literature DB >> 19065104

Immunohistochemical staining for CDX-2, PDX-1, NESP-55, and TTF-1 can help distinguish gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors from pancreatic endocrine and pulmonary carcinoid tumors.

Amitabh Srivastava1, Jason L Hornick.   

Abstract

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNET) of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and lung are histologically similar. Thus, predicting the site of origin of a metastasis is not possible on morphologic grounds. Prior immunohistochemical studies of WDNET have yielded conflicting results, and pancreatic and duodenal homeobox factor-1 (PDX-1) has not previously been evaluated in this context. We therefore analyzed the expression of CDX-2, PDX-1, TTF-1, and neuroendocrine secretory protein-55 (NESP-55), a recently described member of the chromogranin family, in primary and metastatic WDNET. In total, 64 gastrointestinal carcinoids (5 stomach; 5 duodenum; 31 ileum; 11 appendix; and 12 rectum); 39 pancreatic endocrine tumors (PET); and 20 pulmonary carcinoid tumors were studied. PET were positive for NESP-55 (16/39) and PDX-1 (11/39); 3/31 also showed heterogeneous positivity for CDX-2. Ileal carcinoids were exclusively positive for CDX-2 (30/31) and negative for all other markers. Appendiceal carcinoids were uniformly positive for CDX-2 (11/11). All rectal carcinoids were negative for CDX-2 and TTF-1; 2/12 were positive for PDX-1, and 1/12 for NESP-55. The gastric and duodenal carcinoids were only positive for PDX-1 (7/10). TTF-1 positivity was confined to pulmonary carcinoids (7/20); 1/20 was positive for NESP-55; and all were negative for CDX-2 and PDX-1. NESP-55 and PDX-1 positivity, in the presence of negative CDX-2 and TTF-1, was 97% specific for PET. The sensitivity and specificity of CDX-2 positivity for predicting an ileal primary, when PDX-1, NESP-55, and TTF-1 were negative, was 97% and 91%, respectively. TTF-1 positivity was confined to pulmonary carcinoids in our study but was present in only about a third of cases. A panel of these 4 markers may be useful in predicting the primary site of metastatic WDNET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19065104     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31818d7d8b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  37 in total

1.  CDX2 as a marker for intestinal differentiation: Its utility and limitations.

Authors:  Reda S Saad; Zeina Ghorab; Mahmoud A Khalifa; Mei Xu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-27

Review 2.  [The initial CUP situation and CUP syndrome: pathological diagnostics].

Authors:  R Moll
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 3.  The extended granin family: structure, function, and biomedical implications.

Authors:  Alessandro Bartolomucci; Roberta Possenti; Sushil K Mahata; Reiner Fischer-Colbrie; Y Peng Loh; Stephen R J Salton
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 4.  Pathology of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Female Genital Tract.

Authors:  Brooke E Howitt; Paul Kelly; W Glenn McCluggage
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  EPB41L5 is Associated With the Metastatic Potential of Low-grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  James Saller; Shabnam Seydafkan; Mohammad Shahid; Manoj Gadara; Mauro Cives; Steven A Eschrich; David Boulware; Jonathan R Strosberg; Nasir Aejaz; Domenico Coppola
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

6.  Hormonally defined pancreatic and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors differ in their transcription factor signatures: expression of ISL1, PDX1, NGN3, and CDX2.

Authors:  Gratiana Hermann; Björn Konukiewitz; Anja Schmitt; Aurel Perren; Günter Klöppel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  Histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular markers of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Georgios Kyriakopoulos; Vasiliki Mavroeidi; Eleftherios Chatzellis; Gregory A Kaltsas; Krystallenia I Alexandraki
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  The pathological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors: common questions and tentative answers.

Authors:  Marco Volante; Luisella Righi; Alfredo Berruti; Guido Rindi; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 9.  Cutaneous metastases as an initial manifestation of visceral well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor: a report of four cases and a review of literature.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Jedrych; Klaus Busam; David S Klimstra; Melissa Pulitzer
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 1.587

10.  Alternative lengthening of telomeres predicts site of origin in neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases.

Authors:  Epameinondas Dogeas; Georgios Karagkounis; Christopher M Heaphy; Kenzo Hirose; Timothy M Pawlik; Christopher L Wolfgang; Alan Meeker; Ralph H Hruban; John L Cameron; Michael A Choti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.