PURPOSE: Tumor size is a key prognostic variable for soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and a tumor diameter of 5 cm is generally used as a cutoff for risk grouping purposes. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of tumor size on overall survival and whether such an effect was influenced by the patient's size, expressed as body-surface area (BSA), in a series of 553 pediatric patients with localized STS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multivariable Cox models were used in which the effect of tumor size was adjusted for patients age, tumor site, histologic subtype, and Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study grouping, and the interaction between size and BSA was included. RESULTS: Tumor size was confirmed as a significant prognostic factor. Interaction between size and BSA meant that, for a given tumor size, the mortality increased from the larger to the smaller BSA. Conversely, the mortality risk associated with a patient with a BSA of 1.75 m(2) and a 5-cm tumor was the same as for a 0.6 m(2) child with a 2.8-cm tumor. CONCLUSION: Tumor and body size are jointly informative on outcome. The risk associated with a given tumor size is not the same in patients of different body size, so it may be wrong to use the same 5-cm cutoff for tumor size in risk stratification.
PURPOSE:Tumor size is a key prognostic variable for soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and a tumor diameter of 5 cm is generally used as a cutoff for risk grouping purposes. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic effect of tumor size on overall survival and whether such an effect was influenced by the patient's size, expressed as body-surface area (BSA), in a series of 553 pediatric patients with localized STS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multivariable Cox models were used in which the effect of tumor size was adjusted for patients age, tumor site, histologic subtype, and Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study grouping, and the interaction between size and BSA was included. RESULTS:Tumor size was confirmed as a significant prognostic factor. Interaction between size and BSA meant that, for a given tumor size, the mortality increased from the larger to the smaller BSA. Conversely, the mortality risk associated with a patient with a BSA of 1.75 m(2) and a 5-cm tumor was the same as for a 0.6 m(2) child with a 2.8-cm tumor. CONCLUSION:Tumor and body size are jointly informative on outcome. The risk associated with a given tumor size is not the same in patients of different body size, so it may be wrong to use the same 5-cm cutoff for tumor size in risk stratification.
Authors: Jennifer Worch; Katherine K Matthay; John Neuhaus; Robert Goldsby; Steven G DuBois Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Peter Brader; Sara J Abramson; Anita P Price; Nicole M Ishill; Zabor C Emily; Chaya S Moskowitz; Michael P La Quaglia; Michelle S Ginsberg Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Andrea Ferrari; Cristina Meazza; Marco Vajna de Pava; Carlo Alfredo Clerici; Michela Casanova Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Katherine A Janeway; Donald A Barkauskas; Mark D Krailo; Paul A Meyers; Cindy L Schwartz; David H Ebb; Nita L Seibel; Holcombe E Grier; Richard Gorlick; Neyssa Marina Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Florencia Cidre-Aranaz; Sarah Watson; James F Amatruda; Takuro Nakamura; Olivier Delattre; Enrique de Alava; Uta Dirksen; Thomas G P Grünewald Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 65.038
Authors: Jacquelyn N Crane; Wei Xue; Amira Qumseya; Zhengya Gao; Carola A S Arndt; Sarah S Donaldson; Douglas J Harrison; Douglas S Hawkins; Corinne M Linardic; Leo Mascarenhas; William H Meyer; David A Rodeberg; Erin R Rudzinski; Barry L Shulkin; David O Walterhouse; Rajkumar Venkatramani; Aaron R Weiss Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2022-03-06 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: David A Rodeberg; Julie A Stoner; Norbert Garcia-Henriquez; R Lor Randall; Sheri L Spunt; Carola A Arndt; Simon Kao; Charles N Paidas; Lynn Million; Douglas S Hawkins Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 6.860