Literature DB >> 19064965

New utility of an old marker: serial alpha-fetoprotein measurement in predicting radiologic response and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy.

Stephen L Chan1, Frankie K F Mo, Philip J Johnson, Edwin P Hui, Brigette B Y Ma, Wing M Ho, Kwok C Lam, Anthony T C Chan, Tony S K Mok, Winnie Yeo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are limitations in using radiologic evaluation to assess the treatment outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The use of serial alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in monitoring response has not been rigorously evaluated. We aimed to study the clinical value of AFP trend in an attempt to validate AFP as a surrogate serologic end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants from a phase III randomized trial of systemic chemotherapy in HCC were studied. Serum AFP was prospectively collected in parallel with clinical and radiologic outcome. AFP response was defined as a decrease in AFP of more than 20% after a minimum of two cycles of chemotherapy. We studied the relationship between AFP response and treatment outcome in terms of radiologic response and overall survival.
RESULTS: Of 188 patients, 117 patients with elevated serum AFP (> 20 microg/L) and documented radiologic evaluation had received at least two cycles of chemotherapy. A total of 47 AFP responders were identified. AFP responders had better survival than nonresponders (13.5 v 5.6 months, respectively; P < .0001), and AFP response was strongly associated with radiologic response (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis suggested that AFP response was significantly associated with survival (hazard ratio, 0.413; 95% CI, 0.273 to 0.626; P < .0001). AFP responses were frequently observed in patients with radiologically stable disease (SD) and tended to identify a subgroup of SD patients with better survival.
CONCLUSION: Serial AFP measurement is useful in prognostication and monitoring treatment response in HCC patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy. Incorporation of AFP response into the criteria evaluating treatment outcome should be considered in clinical practice and clinical trials of novel agents in HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064965     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.8151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  92 in total

1.  Elevated serum alpha fetoprotein levels promote pathological progression of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Peng Li; Shan-Shan Wang; Hui Liu; Ning Li; Michael A McNutt; Gang Li; Hui-Guo Ding
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Evaluation of molecular targeted cancer drug by changes in tumor marker doubling times.

Authors:  Kenichiro Enooku; Ryosuke Tateishi; Fumihiko Kanai; Yuji Kondo; Ryota Masuzaki; Tadashi Goto; Shuichiro Shiina; Haruhiko Yoshida; Masao Omata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 3.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond sorafenib.

Authors:  Stephen L Chan; Tony Mok; Brigette B Y Ma
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Evaluation of antiangiogenic efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Biomarkers and functional imaging.

Authors:  Mohamed Bouattour; Audrey Payancé; Johanna Wassermann
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-18

5.  Impact of preoperative α-fetoprotein level on disease-free survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabrice Muscari; Jean-Pascal Guinard; Nassim Kamar; Jean-Marie Peron; Philippe Otal; Bertrand Suc
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Predictive biomarkers of antiangiogenic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: where are we?

Authors:  Yu-Yun Shao; Chih-Hung Hsu; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 11.740

7.  Highlights for α-fetoprotein in determining prognosis and treatment monitoring for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xin-Sen Xu; Kai Qu; Chang Liu; Yue-Lang Zhang; Jun Liu; Yan-Zhou Song; Peng Zhang; Si-Nan Liu; Hu-Lin Chang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Assessment of treatment outcomes based on tumor marker trends in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing trans-catheter arterial chemo-embolization.

Authors:  Takuma Arai; Akira Kobayashi; Ayumi Ohya; Masaaki Takahashi; Takahide Yokoyama; Akira Shimizu; Hiroaki Motoyama; Norihiko Furusawa; Tsuyoshi Notake; Noriyuki Kitagawa; Hiroshi Sakai; Hiroshi Imamura; Masumi Kadoya; Shin-Ichi Miyagawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Comparison of Salvage Living Donor Liver Transplantation and Local Regional Therapy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chee-Chien Yong; Ming-Chao Tsai; Chih-Che Lin; Chih-Chi Wang; Sheng-Nan Lu; Chao-Hung Hung; Tsung-Hui Hu; Chao-Long Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Using Modified RECIST and Alpha-Fetoprotein Levels to Assess Treatment Benefit in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Raoul; Joong-Won Park; Yoon-Koo Kang; Richard S Finn; Jun Suk Kim; Winnie Yeo; Blasé N Polite; Yee Chao; Ian Walters; Christine Baudelet; Riccardo Lencioni
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.