Literature DB >> 19064629

The relative activity of "function sparing" HIV-1 entry inhibitors on viral entry and CCR5 internalization: is allosteric functional selectivity a valuable therapeutic property?

Vanessa M Muniz-Medina1, Stacey Jones, Jodi M Maglich, Cristin Galardi, Robert E Hollingsworth, Wieslaw M Kazmierski, Robert G Ferris, Mark P Edelstein, Karen E Chiswell, Terry P Kenakin.   

Abstract

Six allosteric HIV-1 entry inhibitor modulators of the chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) receptor are compared for their potency as inhibitors of HIV-1 entry [infection of human osteosarcoma (HOS) cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)] and antagonists of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3-like 1 [CCL3L1]-mediated internalization of CCR5. This latter activity has been identified as a beneficial action of CCL3L1 in prolonging survival after HIV-1 infection ( Science 307: 1434-1440, 2005 ). The allosteric nature of these modulators was further confirmed with the finding of a 58-fold (HOS cells) and 282-fold (PBMC) difference in relative potency for blockade of CCL3L1-mediated internalization versus HIV-1 entry. For the CCR5 modulators, statistically significant differences in this ratio were found for maraviroc, vicriviroc, aplaviroc, Sch-C, TAK652, and TAK779. For instance, although TAK652 is 13-fold more potent as an HIV-1 inhibitor (over blockade of CCL3L1-mediated CCR5 internalization), this ratio of potency is reversed for Sch-C (22-fold more potent for CCR5-mediated internalization over HIV-1 entry). Quantitative analyses of the insurmountable antagonism of CCR5 internalization by these ligands suggest that all of them reduce the efficacy of CCL3L1 for CCR5 internalization. The relatively small magnitude of dextral displacement accompanying the depression of maximal responses for aplaviroc, maraviroc and vicriviroc suggests that these modulators have minimal effects on CCL3L1 affinity, although possible receptor reserve effects obscure complete interpretation of this effect. These data are discussed in terms of the possible benefits of sparing natural CCR5 chemokine function in HIV-1 entry inhibition treatment for AIDS involving allosteric inhibitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064629     DOI: 10.1124/mol.108.052555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  26 in total

Review 1.  Biased signalling and allosteric machines: new vistas and challenges for drug discovery.

Authors:  Terry P Kenakin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Seven transmembrane receptors as shapeshifting proteins: the impact of allosteric modulation and functional selectivity on new drug discovery.

Authors:  Terry Kenakin; Laurence J Miller
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  From in vitro EC₅₀ to in vivo dose-response for antiretrovirals using an HIV disease model. Part II: application to drug development.

Authors:  Jing Fang; Pravin R Jadhav
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  On the different experimental manifestations of two-state 'induced-fit' binding of drugs to their cellular targets.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Isabelle Van Liefde; David C Swinney
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Emerging paradigms in GPCR allostery: implications for drug discovery.

Authors:  Denise Wootten; Arthur Christopoulos; Patrick M Sexton
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Molecular binding mode of PF-232798, a clinical anti-HIV candidate, at chemokine receptor CCR5.

Authors:  Ya Zhu; Yan-Long Zhao; Jian Li; Hong Liu; Qiang Zhao; Bei-Li Wu; Zhen-Lin Yang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Regulation of G protein-coupled receptors by allosteric ligands.

Authors:  J Robert Lane; Alaa Abdul-Ridha; Meritxell Canals
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 4.418

8.  From in vitro EC₅₀ to in vivo dose-response for antiretrovirals using an HIV disease model. Part I: a framework.

Authors:  Jing Fang; Pravin R Jadhav
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 9.  Minireview: More than just a hammer: ligand "bias" and pharmaceutical discovery.

Authors:  Louis M Luttrell
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-01-16

10.  Distinct Signaling Patterns of Allosteric Antagonism at the P2Y1 Receptor.

Authors:  Zhan-Guo Gao; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.