Cynthia W Karlson1, Michael A Rapoff. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA. ckarlson@ku.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine attrition variables in randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavioral interventions for children with chronic illnesses. METHODS: We examined attrition rates reported on 40 randomized cognitive behavioral interventions published in six pediatric research journals, during the years 2002-2007. Intervention focus was limited to children with a chronic medical condition, such as asthma, obesity, arthritis, diabetes, cancer, sickle cell disease, and cystic fibrosis. RESULTS: Mean rate of enrollment refusal was 37% (range 0-75%). Mean attrition rate was 20% (range 0-54%) for initial follow-up and 32% (range 0-59%) for extended follow-up. Of the reviewed articles, 40% included a CONSORT diagram. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies that can be used to limit attrition include tailoring recruitment to the study population, providing personalized feedback, maintaining consistent study procedures, providing incentives, and using intensive tracking measures. There is a need for standardized definitions and reporting of attrition rates in randomized cognitive behavioral intervention studies.
OBJECTIVE: To examine attrition variables in randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavioral interventions for children with chronic illnesses. METHODS: We examined attrition rates reported on 40 randomized cognitive behavioral interventions published in six pediatric research journals, during the years 2002-2007. Intervention focus was limited to children with a chronic medical condition, such as asthma, obesity, arthritis, diabetes, cancer, sickle cell disease, and cystic fibrosis. RESULTS: Mean rate of enrollment refusal was 37% (range 0-75%). Mean attrition rate was 20% (range 0-54%) for initial follow-up and 32% (range 0-59%) for extended follow-up. Of the reviewed articles, 40% included a CONSORT diagram. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies that can be used to limit attrition include tailoring recruitment to the study population, providing personalized feedback, maintaining consistent study procedures, providing incentives, and using intensive tracking measures. There is a need for standardized definitions and reporting of attrition rates in randomized cognitive behavioral intervention studies.
Authors: Robert Z Blaha; Anne B Arnett; Michael W Kirkwood; H Gerry Taylor; Terry Stancin; Tanya M Brown; Shari L Wade Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Margaret Franciscus; Anita Nucci; Brenda Bradley; Heli Suomalainen; Ellen Greenberg; Diane Laforte; Paivi Kleemola; Mila Hyytinen; Marja Salonen; Mary Jean Martin; Daniel Catte; Jacki Catteau Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Daniel J Zheng; Xiaomin Lu; Reuven J Schore; Lyn Balsamo; Meenakshi Devidas; Naomi J Winick; Elizabeth A Raetz; Mignon L Loh; William L Carroll; Lillian Sung; Stephen P Hunger; Anne L Angiolillo; Nina S Kadan-Lottick Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 6.860