BACKGROUND: Knowledge gaps have contributed to considerable variation among international dietary recommendations for vitamin D. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish the distribution of dietary vitamin D required to maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations above several proposed cutoffs (ie, 25, 37.5, 50, and 80 nmol/L) during wintertime after adjustment for the effect of summer sunshine exposure and diet. DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 22-wk intervention study was conducted in men and women aged 20-40 y (n = 238) by using different supplemental doses (0, 5, 10, and 15 microg/d) of vitamin D(3) throughout the winter. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured by using enzyme-linked immunoassay at baseline (October 2006) and endpoint (March 2007). RESULTS: There were clear dose-related increments (P < 0.0001) in serum 25(OH)D with increasing supplemental vitamin D(3). The slope of the relation between vitamin D intake and serum 25(OH)D was 1.96 nmol x L(-1) x microg(-1) intake. The vitamin D intake that maintained serum 25(OH)D concentrations of >25 nmol/L in 97.5% of the sample was 8.7 microg/d. This intake ranged from 7.2 microg/d in those who enjoyed sunshine exposure, 8.8 microg/d in those who sometimes had sun exposure, and 12.3 microg/d in those who avoided sunshine. Vitamin D intakes required to maintain serum 25(OH)D concentrations of >37.5, >50, and >80 nmol/L in 97.5% of the sample were 19.9, 28.0, and 41.1 microg/d, respectively. CONCLUSION: The range of vitamin D intakes required to ensure maintenance of wintertime vitamin D status [as defined by incremental cutoffs of serum 25(OH)D] in the vast majority (>97.5%) of 20-40-y-old adults, considering a variety of sun exposure preferences, is between 7.2 and 41.1 microg/d.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Knowledge gaps have contributed to considerable variation among international dietary recommendations for vitamin D. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish the distribution of dietary vitamin D required to maintain serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations above several proposed cutoffs (ie, 25, 37.5, 50, and 80 nmol/L) during wintertime after adjustment for the effect of summer sunshine exposure and diet. DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 22-wk intervention study was conducted in men and women aged 20-40 y (n = 238) by using different supplemental doses (0, 5, 10, and 15 microg/d) of vitamin D(3) throughout the winter. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured by using enzyme-linked immunoassay at baseline (October 2006) and endpoint (March 2007). RESULTS: There were clear dose-related increments (P < 0.0001) in serum 25(OH)D with increasing supplemental vitamin D(3). The slope of the relation between vitamin D intake and serum 25(OH)D was 1.96 nmol x L(-1) x microg(-1) intake. The vitamin D intake that maintained serum 25(OH)D concentrations of >25 nmol/L in 97.5% of the sample was 8.7 microg/d. This intake ranged from 7.2 microg/d in those who enjoyed sunshine exposure, 8.8 microg/d in those who sometimes had sun exposure, and 12.3 microg/d in those who avoided sunshine. Vitamin D intakes required to maintain serum 25(OH)D concentrations of >37.5, >50, and >80 nmol/L in 97.5% of the sample were 19.9, 28.0, and 41.1 microg/d, respectively. CONCLUSION: The range of vitamin D intakes required to ensure maintenance of wintertime vitamin D status [as defined by incremental cutoffs of serum 25(OH)D] in the vast majority (>97.5%) of 20-40-y-old adults, considering a variety of sun exposure preferences, is between 7.2 and 41.1 microg/d.
Authors: Kevin D Cashman; Mairead E Kiely; Rikke Andersen; Ida M Grønborg; Katja H Madsen; Janna Nissen; Inge Tetens; Laura Tripkovic; Susan A Lanham-New; Laura Toxqui; M Pilar Vaquero; Ulrike Trautvetter; Gerhard Jahreis; Vikram V Mistry; Bonny L Specker; Jürgen Hower; Anette Knoll; Dennis Wagner; Reinhold Vieth; Inger Öhlund; Pia Karlsland Åkeson; Neil R Brett; Hope A Weiler; Christian Ritz Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Laura M Hall; Michael G Kimlin; Pavel A Aronov; Bruce D Hammock; James R Slusser; Leslie R Woodhouse; Charles B Stephensen Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Marian K Malde; Susanne Bügel; Mette Kristensen; Ketil Malde; Ingvild E Graff; Jan I Pedersen Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: John P Forman; Jamil B Scott; Kimmie Ng; Bettina F Drake; Elizabeth Gonzalez Suarez; Douglas L Hayden; Gary G Bennett; Paulette D Chandler; Bruce W Hollis; Karen M Emmons; Edward L Giovannucci; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew T Chan Journal: Hypertension Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: E M P Backx; M Tieland; K Maase; A K Kies; M Mensink; L J C van Loon; L C P G M de Groot Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Meinrad Peterlik; Steven Boonen; Heide S Cross; Christel Lamberg-Allardt Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 3.390