Literature DB >> 19064025

Dual-site left ventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Luigi Padeletti1, Andrea Colella, Antonio Michelucci, Paolo Pieragnoli, Giuseppe Ricciardi, Maria Cristina Porciani, Francesca Tronconi, Douglas A Hettrick, Sergio Valsecchi.   

Abstract

Simultaneous stimulation of 2 left ventricular (LV) sites could enhance the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute hemodynamic response to dual-site LV CRT. Two LV pacing leads were successfully implanted in 12 CRT candidates (New York Heart Association classes III to IV, QRS >or=120 ms). Target positions were the lateral or posterolateral vein (site A) and anterior or anterolateral vein (site B). A conductance catheter was placed in the left ventricle for pressure-volume measurements. Tested CRT configurations were alternated by atrial overdrive pacing at a fixed rate and included site A and B single-site CRT and dual-site LV CRT (2 LV sites plus right ventricular apex) at 4 atrioventricular intervals. Overall, single-site LV CRT significantly enhanced stroke volume, stroke work, maximum pressure derivative, and conductance-derived indexes of LV synchrony when delivered in site A, whereas no significant changes were noticed with pacing in site B. Specifically, site-A pacing resulted in a higher stroke volume increase (LV pacing site associated with the best hemodynamic response [best-LV]) in 8 patients, and site-B pacing, in 4 patients. At intermediate atrioventricular intervals, dual-site LV CRT resulted in improved stroke volume, stroke work, maximum pressure derivative, and LV synchrony with respect to single-site CRT when delivered at the best-LV (all p <0.05). However, single-site CRT at best-LV produced results similar to dual-site LV CRT when the atrioventricular interval was optimized in each patient. In conclusion, adding a second LV lead does not result in further improvement in acute hemodynamic response with respect to standard CRT when the single LV pacing site and atrioventricular interval are optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064025     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

Review 1.  Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Left ventricular endocardial pacing and multisite pacing to improve CRT response.

Authors:  Sylvain Ploux; Zachary Whinnett; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Multisite Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Promise and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

5.  Clinical validation of a real-time data processing system for cardiac output and arterial pressure measurement during intraoperative biventricular pacing optimization.

Authors:  Christopher K Johnson; Santos E Cabreriza; Rana L Sahar; Alexander Rusanov; Daniel Y Wang; Bin Cheng; Mira S Gendy; T Alexander Quinn; Henry Michael Spotnitz
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Multisite cardiac resynchronization therapy for traditional and non-traditional indications.

Authors:  Avishag Laish-Farkash; Sharon Bruoha; Vladimir Khalameizer; Chaim Yosefy; Yoav Michowitz; Mahmoud Suleiman; Amos Katz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy based on a cardiac electromechanics-perfusion computational model.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Jenny S Choy; Farshad Raissi; Ghassan S Kassab; Lik Chuan Lee
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.589

8.  In Heart Failure Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block Single Lead MultiSpot Left Ventricular Pacing Does Not Improve Acute Hemodynamic Response To Conventional Biventricular Pacing. A Multicenter Prospective, Interventional, Non-Randomized Study.

Authors:  Maciej Sterliński; Adam Sokal; Radosław Lenarczyk; Frederic Van Heuverswyn; C Aldo Rinaldi; Marc Vanderheyden; Vladimir Khalameizer; Darrel Francis; Joeri Heynens; Berthold Stegemann; Richard Cornelussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Radial Multi-Site, Longitudinal Multi-Polar Epicardial Left Ventricular Pacing In Tricuspid Valve Disease.

Authors:  Ernest W Lau; Tony McEntee; Kyle B Ashfield; Alastair N Graham
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2016-09

10.  Multi-site multi-polar left ventricular pacing through persistent left superior vena cava in tricuspid valve disease.

Authors:  Ernest W Lau
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.