Literature DB >> 19062115

The social welfare function and individual responsibility: some theoretical issues and empirical evidence.

Paul Dolan1, Aki Tsuchiya.   

Abstract

The literature on income distribution has attempted to evaluate different degrees of inequality using a social welfare function (SWF) approach. However, it has largely ignored the source of such inequalities, and has thus failed to consider different degrees of inequity. The literature on egalitarianism has addressed issues of equity, largely in relation to individual responsibility. This paper builds upon these two literatures, and introduces individual responsibility into the SWF. Results from a small-scale study of people's preferences in relation to the distribution of health benefits are presented to illustrate how the parameter values of a SWF might be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062115     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  6 in total

Review 1.  Market access of cancer drugs in European countries: improving resource allocation.

Authors:  Kim Pauwels; Isabelle Huys; Minne Casteels; Katelijne De Nys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.493

2.  Eliciting the Level of Health Inequality Aversion in England.

Authors:  Matthew Robson; Miqdad Asaria; Richard Cookson; Aki Tsuchiya; Shehzad Ali
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Who should receive treatment? An empirical enquiry into the relationship between societal views and preferences concerning healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Vivian Reckers-Droog; Job van Exel; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Stigma and policy preference toward individuals who transition from prescription opioids to heroin.

Authors:  Kimberly Goodyear; David Chavanne
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  Exploring what lies behind public preferences for avoiding health losses caused by lapses in healthcare safety and patient lifestyle choices.

Authors:  Jeshika Singh; Louise Longworth; Amanda Baine; Joanne Lord; Shepley Orr; Martin Buxton
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Moral responsibility for (un)healthy behaviour.

Authors:  Rebecca C H Brown
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.903

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.