BACKGROUND: Cognitive models and interventions for anxiety assume that socially anxious individuals interpret ambiguous social information in a threatening manner. However, experimental evidence for this hypothesised cognitive bias is mixed. The present study is novel in using a signal detection approach to clarify whether Generalised Social Phobia (GSP) is associated with biased identification of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. METHODS: 16 patients with GSP and 17 non-anxious volunteers classified ambiguous emotional facial expressions, with each face reflecting a blend of two emotions: angry-happy, fearful-happy and fearful-angry. Discrimination accuracy and response criterion were assessed. RESULTS: Patients with GSP showed significantly poorer discrimination of ambiguous emotional facial expressions that contained an element of fear (i.e., fearful-happy and fearful-angry expressions), compared to non-anxious controls. The groups did not significantly differ in discrimination of faces which lacked fear content (i.e., angry-happy blend), or on measures of response criterion. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, coexisting depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a selective impairment in fear identification in GSP. Results are discussed with reference to neurocognitive models of anxiety, and research on serotonergic modulation of emotional face processing.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive models and interventions for anxiety assume that socially anxious individuals interpret ambiguous social information in a threatening manner. However, experimental evidence for this hypothesised cognitive bias is mixed. The present study is novel in using a signal detection approach to clarify whether Generalised Social Phobia (GSP) is associated with biased identification of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. METHODS: 16 patients with GSP and 17 non-anxious volunteers classified ambiguous emotional facial expressions, with each face reflecting a blend of two emotions: angry-happy, fearful-happy and fearful-angry. Discrimination accuracy and response criterion were assessed. RESULTS:Patients with GSP showed significantly poorer discrimination of ambiguous emotional facial expressions that contained an element of fear (i.e., fearful-happy and fearful-angry expressions), compared to non-anxious controls. The groups did not significantly differ in discrimination of faces which lacked fear content (i.e., angry-happy blend), or on measures of response criterion. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, coexisting depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate a selective impairment in fear identification in GSP. Results are discussed with reference to neurocognitive models of anxiety, and research on serotonergic modulation of emotional face processing.
Authors: Bethany C Reeb-Sutherland; Lela Rankin Williams; Kathryn A Degnan; Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Seth D Pollak; Nathan A Fox Journal: Cogn Emot Date: 2014-05-06
Authors: Susan Bamford; Ian Penton-Voak; Verity Pinkney; David S Baldwin; Marcus R Munafò; Matthew Garner Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Verity Pinkney; Robin Wickens; Susan Bamford; David S Baldwin; Matthew Garner Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 4.153