Literature DB >> 19062098

Superior versus inferior Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation.

Mohammad Pakravan1, Shahin Yazdani, Camelia Shahabi, Mehdi Yaseri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) (New World Medical Inc., Rancho Cucamonga, CA) implantation in the superior versus inferior quadrants.
DESIGN: Prospective parallel cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 106 eyes of 106 patients with refractory glaucoma.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with refractory glaucoma underwent AGV implantation in the superior or inferior quadrants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP) and rate of complications. Other outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of glaucoma medications, and success rate (defined as at least 30% IOP reduction and 5<IOP <22 mmHg with or without medications). Criteria for failure included implant removal, additional glaucoma surgery, phthisis bulbi, or loss of light perception.
RESULTS: Of a total of 106 eyes, 58 and 48 eyes underwent AGV implantation in the superior and inferior quadrants, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the study groups, except for preoperative IOP, which was higher in the superior group (P = 0.01). Patients were followed for a mean period of 10.6+/-8.49 months and 10.58+/-6.75 months in the superior and inferior groups, respectively (P = 0.477). BCVA was comparable between the groups at all postoperative visits (P>0.122). After 1 year, statistically significant but comparable IOP reduction from baseline (P<0.001) was achieved in both groups (47.0%+/-27.2% and 43.0%+/-24.5% reduction for superior and inferior groups, respectively, P = 0.725). The mean number of glaucoma medications was comparable after 1 year (1.3+/-1.2 vs. 1.9+/-0.8 for superior and inferior implants, respectively, P = 0.256). Success rates were also similar at 1 year: 27 eyes (81.8%) versus 20 eyes (95.2%) for superior and inferior implants, respectively (P = 0.227). However, the overall rate of complications, such as implant exposure necessitating removal, cosmetically unappealing appearance, and endophthalmitis, was higher in the inferior group: 12 eyes (25%) versus 3 eyes (5.2%) for superior and inferior groups, respectively, (P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Superior and inferior AGV implants have similar intermediate efficacy in terms of IOP reduction, decrease in number of glaucoma medications, and preservation of vision. However, the inferior quadrants entail significantly more complications. It may be prudent to avoid AGV implantation in the inferior quadrants if the superior quadrants have no contraindications to surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062098     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  23 in total

1.  Glaucoma drainage devices: risk of exposure and infection.

Authors:  Joshua D Levinson; Annette L Giangiacomo; Allen D Beck; Paul B Pruett; Hillary M Superak; Michael J Lynn; Anastasios P Costarides
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Aqueous shunts for glaucoma.

Authors:  Victoria L Tseng; Anne L Coleman; Melinda Y Chang; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-28

3.  Long-term outcomes of glaucoma drainage devices for glaucoma post-vitreoretinal surgery with silicone oil insertion: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Shikha Gupta; Abadh K Chaurasia; Rohan Chawla; Kulwant Singh Kapoor; Karthikeyan Mahalingam; Deepa R Swamy; Viney Gupta
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Treatment of Oculoplastic and Ocular Surface Disease in Eyes Implanted with a Type I Boston Keratoprosthesis in Southern China: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yuying Zhang; Zhancong Ou; Jin Zhou; Jiajie Zhai; Jianjun Gu; Jiaqi Chen
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Clinical outcomes of gamma-irradiated sterile cornea in aqueous drainage device surgery: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Q Pan; H D Jampel; P Ramulu; G F Schwartz; F Cotter; D Cute; Y J Daoud; P Murakami; W J Stark
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Treatment outcomes in the neovascular glaucoma tube versus trabeculectomy study.

Authors:  Kana Tokumo; Kaori Komatsu; Yuki Yuasa; Yumiko Murakami; Hideaki Okumichi; Kazuyuki Hirooka; Shunsuke Nakakura; Hitoshi Tabuchi; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  The best thickness of cornea graft from SMILE surgery as patch graft in glaucoma drainage implant surgery.

Authors:  Yuhong Wang; Jinkun Liu; Weiyi Huang; Yazhang Xu; Meizhu Cheng; Zhengwei Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Comparison of Generalized Estimating Equations and Quadratic Inference Functions in superior versus inferior Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation.

Authors:  Razieh Khajeh-Kazemi; Banafsheh Golestan; Kazem Mohammad; Mahmoud Mahmoudi; Saharnaz Nedjat; Mohammad Pakravan
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Risk factors for exposure of glaucoma drainage devices: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Kelly W Muir; Annie Lim; Sandra Stinnett; Anthony Kuo; Henry Tseng; Molly M Walsh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Assessment of Filtration Bleb and Endplate Positioning Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Eyes Implanted with Long-Tube Glaucoma Drainage Devices.

Authors:  Ichiya Sano; Masaki Tanito; Koji Uchida; Takashi Katsube; Hajime Kitagaki; Akihiro Ohira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.