Literature DB >> 19061930

REACH, non-testing approaches and the urgent need for a change in mind set.

G Schaafsma1, E D Kroese, E L J P Tielemans, J J M Van de Sandt, C J Van Leeuwen.   

Abstract

The objectives of REACH cannot be achieved under the current risk assessment approach. A change in mind set among all the relevant stakeholders is needed: risk assessment should move away from a labor-intensive and animal-consuming approach to intelligent and pragmatic testing, by combining exposure and hazard data effectively and trying to group chemicals (category approaches). The focus should be on reducing the overall uncertainties of 30,000 chemicals while acknowledging the existence of the uncertainty paradox: reducing uncertainty in the assessment of individual chemicals following the classical chemical-by-chemical approach as we have in previous decades will result in a prolongation of uncertainty for the entire group of 30,000 chemicals as a whole. With the first REACH registration deadline (2010) rapidly approaching, a mind set change is urgently needed. We can speed up the regulatory acceptance process, starting with the maximum use of currently available exposure and hazard data, tools and models. Optimal use should also be made of experimental exposure and hazard data generated under REACH. Only such an approach will make it possible to obtain a sufficient level of information within the time frame of REACH. A much more intensive dialogue between stakeholders is necessary.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19061930     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  7 in total

1.  Toxicity testing by category for 30,000 chemicals?

Authors:  Kees van Leeuwen; Gerwin Schaafsma
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Age matters: Developmental stage of Danio rerio larvae influences photomotor response thresholds to diazinion or diphenhydramine.

Authors:  Lauren A Kristofco; Luis Colon Cruz; Samuel P Haddad; Martine L Behra; C Kevin Chambliss; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Integrated testing strategies for safety assessments.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung; Tom Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; Andre Kleensang
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  Creating a human-induced pluripotent stem cell-based NKX2.5 reporter gene assay for developmental toxicity testing.

Authors:  Karin Lauschke; Andreas Frederik Treschow; Mikkel Aabech Rasmussen; Nichlas Davidsen; Bjørn Holst; Jenny Emnéus; Camilla Taxvig; Anne Marie Vinggaard
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  In silico toxicology - non-testing methods.

Authors:  Hannu Raunio
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) is but the first step-how far will it take us? Six further steps to improve the European chemicals legislation.

Authors:  Christina Rudén; Sven Ove Hansson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Toxicology across scales: Cell population growth in vitro predicts reduced fish growth.

Authors:  Julita Stadnicka-Michalak; Kristin Schirmer; Roman Ashauer
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 14.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.