Literature DB >> 19061776

Cancer-causing karyotypes: chromosomal equilibria between destabilizing aneuploidy and stabilizing selection for oncogenic function.

Lin Li1, Amanda A McCormack, Joshua M Nicholson, Alice Fabarius, Ruediger Hehlmann, Rainer K Sachs, Peter H Duesberg.   

Abstract

The chromosomes of cancer cells are unstable, because of aneuploidy. Despite chromosomal instability, however, cancer karyotypes are individual and quasi-stable, as is evident especially from clonal chromosome copy numbers and marker chromosomes. This paradox would be resolved if the karyotypes in cancers represent chromosomal equilibria between destabilizing aneuploidy and stabilizing selection for oncogenic function. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the initial and long-term karyotypes of seven clones of newly transformed human epithelial, mammary, and muscle cells. Approximately 1 in 100,000 such cells generates transformed clones at 2-3 months after introduction of retrovirus-activated cellular genes or the tumor virus SV40. These frequencies are too low for direct transformation, so we postulated that virus-activated genes initiate transformation indirectly, via specific karyotypes. Using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes, we found individual clonal karyotypes that were stable for at least 34 cell generations-within limits, as follows. Depending on the karyotype, average clonal chromosome numbers were stable within +/- 3%, and chromosome-specific copy numbers were stable in 70-100% cells. At any one time, however, relative to clonal means, per-cell chromosome numbers varied +/-18% and chromosome-specific copy numbers varied +/-1 in 0-30% of cells; unstable nonclonal markers were found within karyotype-specific quotas of <1% to 20% of the total chromosome number. For two clones, karyotypic ploidies also varied. With these rates of variation, the karyotypes of transformed clones would randomize in a few generations unless selection occurs. We conclude that individual aneuploid karyotypes initiate and maintain cancers, much like new species. These cancer-causing karyotypes are in flexible equilibrium between destabilizing aneuploidy and stabilizing selection for transforming function. Karyotypes as a whole, rather than specific mutations, explain the individuality, fluidity, and phenotypic complexity of cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19061776     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2008.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  20 in total

Review 1.  The wayward methyl group and the cascade to cancer.

Authors:  Robert M Hoffman
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Genome-based versus gene-based theory of cancer: possible implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Natasa Todorovic-Rakovic
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Genomic instability and copy-number heterogeneity of chromosome 19q, including the kallikrein locus, in ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Jane Bayani; Paula Marrano; Cassandra Graham; Yingye Zheng; Lin Li; Dionyssios Katsaros; Heini Lassus; Ralf Butzow; Jeremy A Squire; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Somatic genome variations in health and disease.

Authors:  I Y Iourov; S G Vorsanova; Y B Yurov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

5.  BubbleTree: an intuitive visualization to elucidate tumoral aneuploidy and clonality using next generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Michael Kuziora; Todd Creasy; Zhongwu Lai; Christopher Morehouse; Xiang Guo; Yinong Sebastian; Dong Shen; Jiaqi Huang; Jonathan R Dry; Feng Xue; Liyan Jiang; Yihong Yao; Brandon W Higgs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Astrocytes derived from trisomic human embryonic stem cells express markers of astrocytic cancer cells and premalignant stem-like progenitors.

Authors:  Sailesh Gopalakrishna-Pillai; Linda E Iverson
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Molecular cytogenetic diagnosis and somatic genome variations.

Authors:  S G Vorsanova; Y B Yurov; I V Soloviev; I Y Iourov
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.236

8.  Karyotypic evolutions of cancer species in rats during the long latent periods after injection of nitrosourea.

Authors:  Mathew Bloomfield; Amanda McCormack; Daniele Mandrioli; Christian Fiala; C Marcelo Aldaz; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  Cancer gene discovery in mouse and man.

Authors:  Jenny Mattison; Louise van der Weyden; Tim Hubbard; David J Adams
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-03-12

10.  Immortality of cancers: a consequence of inherent karyotypic variations and selections for autonomy.

Authors:  Peter Duesberg; Amanda McCormack
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.