Literature DB >> 19061447

An improvement focus in public reporting: the Queensland approach.

Stephen J Duckett1, Justin Collins, Maarten Kamp, Kew Walker.   

Abstract

In many settings, public reporting of health care outcomes still reflects the "name-shame-blame" culture that has permeated large areas of the health care sector for decades. A new approach to public reporting in Queensland, based on statistical process control, emphasises the dynamic nature of performance against specified outcome measures by focusing on the actions that hospitals are taking if their indicators vary from the average. The aim is for public reporting to contribute to, rather than detract from, the creation of an internal culture that emphasises rigorous investigation and improvement rather than merely assigning blame for problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19061447     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02213.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  2 in total

1.  Court-ordered assessments and routine access to confidential health information: findings from a regional forensic mental health service.

Authors:  Claudia van Kan; Shailesh Kumar
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-09-02

2.  How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure.

Authors:  Berber S Laarman; Renée Jr Bouwman; Anke Je de Veer; Michelle Hendriks; Roland D Friele
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.