CONTEXT: Angiogenesis is essential for tumors to grow and metastasize. Lymphatic metastasis is also an important means of tumor spread. In non-small cell lung carcinoma, the relationship of lymphangiogenesis with lymph node metastasis and, ultimately, patient prognosis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether lymphangiogenesis is related to lymph node metastasis and/or overall survival. DESIGN: Seventy-eight cases of non-small cell lung carcinoma diagnosed from 1987 to 2004 were retrospectively analyzed for intratumoral, peritumoral, and uninvolved adjacent lung tissue lymphatic vessel density (LVD) by D2-40 immunostaining. Lymphatics in 6 cases of squamous dysplasia/carcinoma in situ were similarly evaluated. Appropriate statistical methods were used. RESULTS: Intratumoral and peritumoral LVD was significantly higher than in the uninvolved adjacent lung but showed no significant association with lymph node stage at the time of tumor resection. Survival in patients with above average D2-40 values was not significantly different when compared with those who had below average values (median survival, 895 vs 1131 days; P = .97). Furthermore, patients with affected lymph nodes had significantly shorter survival (median survival, 467 vs 1425 days; P = .002). Overall, regardless of lymph node status, there was a significantly higher intratumoral (P < .001) and peritumoral (P < .001) LVD when compared with the adjacent uninvolved lung LVD. There was a trend toward increasing LVD with higher grade of squamous dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that although lymphangiogenesis occurs in association with non-small cell lung carcinoma, it may not be an important factor in lymph node metastasis. In fact, there is a suggestion that the number of lymphatics that a person inherently has appears to be more important than lymphangiogenesis when it comes to the development of lymph node metastasis.
CONTEXT: Angiogenesis is essential for tumors to grow and metastasize. Lymphatic metastasis is also an important means of tumor spread. In non-small cell lung carcinoma, the relationship of lymphangiogenesis with lymph node metastasis and, ultimately, patient prognosis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether lymphangiogenesis is related to lymph node metastasis and/or overall survival. DESIGN: Seventy-eight cases of non-small cell lung carcinoma diagnosed from 1987 to 2004 were retrospectively analyzed for intratumoral, peritumoral, and uninvolved adjacent lung tissue lymphatic vessel density (LVD) by D2-40 immunostaining. Lymphatics in 6 cases of squamous dysplasia/carcinoma in situ were similarly evaluated. Appropriate statistical methods were used. RESULTS: Intratumoral and peritumoral LVD was significantly higher than in the uninvolved adjacent lung but showed no significant association with lymph node stage at the time of tumor resection. Survival in patients with above average D2-40 values was not significantly different when compared with those who had below average values (median survival, 895 vs 1131 days; P = .97). Furthermore, patients with affected lymph nodes had significantly shorter survival (median survival, 467 vs 1425 days; P = .002). Overall, regardless of lymph node status, there was a significantly higher intratumoral (P < .001) and peritumoral (P < .001) LVD when compared with the adjacent uninvolved lung LVD. There was a trend toward increasing LVD with higher grade of squamous dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that although lymphangiogenesis occurs in association with non-small cell lung carcinoma, it may not be an important factor in lymph node metastasis. In fact, there is a suggestion that the number of lymphatics that a person inherently has appears to be more important than lymphangiogenesis when it comes to the development of lymph node metastasis.
Authors: Kyung Hoon Min; Seoung Ju Park; Kyung Sun Lee; Sung Ho Hwang; So Ri Kim; Hee Moon; Hyo Jin Han; Myoung Ja Chung; Yong Chul Lee Journal: Lung Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Daniel V T Catenacci; Gustavo Cervantes; Soheil Yala; Erik A Nelson; Essam El-Hashani; Rajani Kanteti; Mohamed El Dinali; Rifat Hasina; Johannes Brägelmann; Tanguy Seiwert; Michele Sanicola; Les Henderson; Tatyana A Grushko; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Theodore Karrison; Yung-Jue Bang; Woo Ho Kim; Maria Tretiakova; Everett Vokes; David A Frank; Hedy L Kindler; Heather Huet; Ravi Salgia Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Thomas K Kilvaer; Erna-Elise Paulsen; Sigurd M Hald; Tom Wilsgaard; Roy M Bremnes; Lill-Tove Busund; Tom Donnem Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240