BACKGROUND: Plasmacytic differentiation in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) occurs rarely. However, no flow cytometric studies that demonstrate plasmacytic (PC) differentiation in MCL have been reported. Herein, we report a case of MCL with PC differentiation identified by flow cytometry. METHODS: Morphologic review was performed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections from paraffin-embedded lymph node, colon and bone marrow specimens, and Wright-Geimsa stained bone marrow aspirate smears and touch imprints. Immunohistochemical stains using antibodies against CD3, CD5, CD20, and cyclin-D1, and in-situ hybridization for kappa and lambda light chains were reviewed. Multicolor flow cytometry analysis was performed on the bone marrow aspirate with monoclonal antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, CD14, CD19, CD20, CD23, CD38, CD45, CD56, CD138, and kappa and lambda light chains. FISH analysis for t(11;14)(q13;q32) was performed on interphase cells. RESULTS: The neoplastic cells had the cytologic features of MCL with nodal, bone marrow, and colonic involvement. In-situ hybridization for kappa and lambda light chains demonstrated clonal plasma cells in the lymph node and bone marrow biopsies. In addition, flow cytometric studies of the bone marrow aspirate showed three populations of neoplastic cells: a clonal B-cell population with typical MCL phenotype, a similar B-cell population in transition to plasma cells, and a clonal plasma cell population. The plasma cells retained CD5 expression and had the same light chain restriction as the clonal B-cells. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-parameter flow cytometry can be useful in demonstrating clonal PC differentiation in MCL and distinguishing from a concurrent but unrelated plasma cell dyscrasia. (c) 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society.
BACKGROUND: Plasmacytic differentiation in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) occurs rarely. However, no flow cytometric studies that demonstrate plasmacytic (PC) differentiation in MCL have been reported. Herein, we report a case of MCL with PC differentiation identified by flow cytometry. METHODS: Morphologic review was performed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained sections from paraffin-embedded lymph node, colon and bone marrow specimens, and Wright-Geimsa stained bone marrow aspirate smears and touch imprints. Immunohistochemical stains using antibodies against CD3, CD5, CD20, and cyclin-D1, and in-situ hybridization for kappa and lambda light chains were reviewed. Multicolor flow cytometry analysis was performed on the bone marrow aspirate with monoclonal antibodies to CD3, CD4, CD5, CD8, CD14, CD19, CD20, CD23, CD38, CD45, CD56, CD138, and kappa and lambda light chains. FISH analysis for t(11;14)(q13;q32) was performed on interphase cells. RESULTS: The neoplastic cells had the cytologic features of MCL with nodal, bone marrow, and colonic involvement. In-situ hybridization for kappa and lambda light chains demonstrated clonal plasma cells in the lymph node and bone marrow biopsies. In addition, flow cytometric studies of the bone marrow aspirate showed three populations of neoplastic cells: a clonal B-cell population with typical MCL phenotype, a similar B-cell population in transition to plasma cells, and a clonal plasma cell population. The plasma cells retained CD5 expression and had the same light chain restriction as the clonal B-cells. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-parameter flow cytometry can be useful in demonstrating clonal PC differentiation in MCL and distinguishing from a concurrent but unrelated plasma cell dyscrasia. (c) 2008 Clinical Cytometry Society.
Authors: Carlo Visco; Sylvia Hoeller; Jeffrey T Malik; Zijun Y Xu-Monette; Michele L Wiggins; Jessica Liu; Warren G Sanger; Zhongfeng Liu; Julie Chang; Erik A Ranheim; Joel F Gradowski; Sergio Serrano; Huan-You Wang; Qingquan Liu; Sandeep Dave; Brian Olsen; Randy D Gascoyne; Elias Campo; Steven H Swerdlow; Wing C Chan; Alexander Tzankov; Ken H Young Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Patricia Pérez-Galán; Helena Mora-Jensen; Marc A Weniger; Arthur L Shaffer; Edgar G Rizzatti; Colby M Chapman; Clifton C Mo; Lawrence S Stennett; Christoph Rader; Poching Liu; Nalini Raghavachari; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Constance Yuan; Stefania Pittaluga; Irina Maric; Kieron M Dunleavy; Wyndham H Wilson; Louis M Staudt; Adrian Wiestner Journal: Blood Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Inmaculada Ribera-Cortada; Daniel Martinez; Virginia Amador; Cristina Royo; Alba Navarro; Silvia Beà; Eva Gine; Laurence de Leval; Sergio Serrano; Andrew Wotherspoon; Dolors Colomer; Antonio Martinez; Elías Campo Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Steven H Swerdlow; Isinsu Kuzu; Ahmet Dogan; Stephan Dirnhofer; John K C Chan; Birgitta Sander; German Ott; Luc Xerri; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; Elias Campo Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2015-10-10 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Man Fai Law; Hay Nun Chan; Charlotte Leung; Cheuk Kei Wong; Ho Kei Lai; Chung Yin Ha; Celia Ng; Yiu Ming Yeung; Sze Fai Yip Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Joanna C Dalland; James B Smadbeck; Neeraj Sharma; Reid G Meyer; Kathryn E Pearce; Patricia T Greipp; Jess F Peterson; Shaji Kumar; Rhett P Ketterling; Rebecca L King; Linda B Baughn Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 5.006