Literature DB >> 19060332

Biased selection of leading process branches mediates chemotaxis during tangential neuronal migration.

Francisco J Martini1, Manuel Valiente, Guillermina López Bendito, Gábor Szabó, Fernando Moya, Miguel Valdeolmillos, Oscar Marín.   

Abstract

Current models of chemotaxis during neuronal migration and axon guidance propose that directional sensing relies on growth cone dynamics. According to this view, migrating neurons and growing axons are guided to their correct targets by steering the growth cone in response to attractive and repulsive cues. Here, we have performed a detailed analysis of the dynamic behavior of individual neurons migrating tangentially in telencephalic slices using high-resolution time-lapse videomicroscopy. We found that cortical interneurons consistently display branched leading processes as part of their migratory cycle, a feature that seems to be common to many other populations of GABAergic neurons in the brain and spinal cord. Analysis of the migratory behavior of individual cells suggests that interneurons respond to chemoattractant signals by generating new leading process branches that are better aligned with the source of the gradient, and not by reorienting previously existing branches. Moreover, experimental evidence revealed that guidance cues influence the angle at which new branches emerge. This model is further supported by pharmacological experiments in which inhibition of branching blocked chemotaxis, suggesting that this process is an essential component of the mechanism controlling directional guidance. These results reveal a novel guidance mechanism during neuronal migration that might be extensively used in brain development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19060332     DOI: 10.1242/dev.025502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  61 in total

1.  Wandering neuronal migration in the postnatal vertebrate forebrain.

Authors:  Benjamin B Scott; Timothy Gardner; Ni Ji; Michale S Fee; Carlos Lois
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Understanding eukaryotic chemotaxis: a pseudopod-centred view.

Authors:  Robert H Insall
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Rostral migratory stream neuroblasts turn and change directions in stereotypic patterns.

Authors:  Noelia Martinez-Molina; Yongsoo Kim; Philip Hockberger; Francis G Szele
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  Rostro-Caudal and Caudo-Rostral Migrations in the Telencephalon: Going Forward or Backward?

Authors:  Nuria Ruiz-Reig; Michèle Studer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  SDF1 regulates leading process branching and speed of migrating interneurons.

Authors:  Daniel E Lysko; Mary Putt; Jeffrey A Golden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Organotypic slice cultures of embryonic ventral midbrain: a system to study dopaminergic neuronal development in vitro.

Authors:  Gabriela Oana Bodea; Sandra Blaess
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Dynamics of the leading process, nucleus, and Golgi apparatus of migrating cortical interneurons in living mouse embryos.

Authors:  Mitsutoshi Yanagida; Ryota Miyoshi; Ryohei Toyokuni; Yan Zhu; Fujio Murakami
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  MACF1 Controls Migration and Positioning of Cortical GABAergic Interneurons in Mice.

Authors:  Minhan Ka; Jeffrey J Moffat; Woo-Yang Kim
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Development and Functional Diversification of Cortical Interneurons.

Authors:  Lynette Lim; Da Mi; Alfredo Llorca; Oscar Marín
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Random versus directionally persistent cell migration.

Authors:  Ryan J Petrie; Andrew D Doyle; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 94.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.