Literature DB >> 19059757

Development and validation of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Vascular Surgery (REAL_VS).

Lorraine S Wallace1, William F Ergen, David C Cassada, Michael B Freeman, Oscar H Grandas, Scott L Stevens, Mitchell H Goldman.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to develop and validate the (1) Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Vascular Surgery (REAL_VS) for researchers studying the impact of literacy skills as related to vascular surgery-related knowledge and outcomes and (2) short version of the REAL_VS (REAL_VSs) to allow clinicians to gauge their patients' familiarity with vascular surgery-related terms. A three-phase process was used to identify potential words for inclusion in the REAL_VS, including reviewing Internet-based patient education material content and listening to a random sample of 50 archived audiorecordings of vascular surgeon-patient encounters. The REAL_VS was composed of 75 terms (e.g., stent, gangrene, invasive, aneurysm) of varying pronunciation difficulty. One hundred fifty-two English-speaking patients (>or=18 years of age) attending a university-based vascular surgery clinic were recruited to participate in this study (mean age = 61.4 +/- 14.6 years). During face-to-face interviews, patients' sociodemographic information was collected, and patients were administered the widely used Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM) and REAL_VS. Mean scores on the REALM (56.9 +/- 14.0) and REAL_VS (63.3 +/- 15.6) were highly correlated (Spearmans rank correlation [rho] = 0.91; p < 0.00). Internal consistency of the REAL_VS (Cronbachs alpha = 0.98) was excellent. Mean scores on the REAL_VSs (4.1 +/- 2.7) were highly correlated with both the REALM (rho = 0.82; p < 0.00) and REAL_VS (rho = 0.94; p < 0.00). Internal consistency, measured using Cronbachs alpha, of the REAL_VSs was 0.86. This study demonstrates that both the REAL_VS and REAL_VSs are both promising tools for use in vascular surgery research and clinical practice, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19059757     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  7 in total

Review 1.  State of the science of health literacy measures: Validity implications for minority populations.

Authors:  Tam H Nguyen; Hyunjeong Park; Hae-Ra Han; Kitty S Chan; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Jolie Haun; Miyong T Kim
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-29

2.  Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.

Authors:  Mahmoud Tavousi; Samira Mohammadi; Jila Sadighi; Fatemeh Zarei; Ramin Mozafari Kermani; Rahele Rostami; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Health Literacy in Patients Seeking Orthopaedic Care: Results of the Literacy in Musculoskeletal Problems (LIMP) Project.

Authors:  Andrew J Rosenbaum; Denis Pauze; Daniel Pauze; Nancy Robak; Ralph Zade; Michael Mulligan; Richard L Uhl
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

Review 4.  The impact of health literacy in the care of surgical patients: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Gildasio S De Oliveira; Robert J McCarthy; Michael S Wolf; Jane Holl
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  QuikLitE, a Framework for Quick Literacy Evaluation in Medicine: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Jiaping Zheng; Hong Yu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Health Literacy in Surgery.

Authors:  Michelle E Chang; Samantha J Baker; Isabel C Dos Santos Marques; Amandiy N Liwo; Sebastian K Chung; Joshua S Richman; Sara J Knight; Mona N Fouad; C Ann Gakumo; Terry C Davis; Daniel I Chu
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2020-02-11

7.  A Pilot Study to Develop the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Audiology.

Authors:  Hua Ou
Journal:  Health Lit Res Pract       Date:  2022-05-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.