Literature DB >> 19059584

Phonetic recalibration only occurs in speech mode.

Jean Vroomen1, Martijn Baart.   

Abstract

Upon hearing an ambiguous speech sound dubbed onto lipread speech, listeners adjust their phonetic categories in accordance with the lipread information (recalibration) that tells what the phoneme should be. Here we used sine wave speech (SWS) to show that this tuning effect occurs if the SWS sounds are perceived as speech, but not if the sounds are perceived as non-speech. In contrast, selective speech adaptation occurred irrespective of whether listeners were in speech or non-speech mode. These results provide new evidence for the distinction between a speech and non-speech processing mode, and they demonstrate that different mechanisms underlie recalibration and selective speech adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19059584     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  11 in total

1.  Estimating speech spectra for copy synthesis by linear prediction and by hand.

Authors:  Robert E Remez; Kathryn R Dubowski; Morgana L Davids; Emily F Thomas; Nina U Paddu; Yael S Grossman; Marina Moskalenko
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Multistage audiovisual integration of speech: dissociating identification and detection.

Authors:  Kasper Eskelund; Jyrki Tuomainen; Tobias S Andersen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Phonetic matching of auditory and visual speech develops during childhood: evidence from sine-wave speech.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Heather Bortfeld; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-09-23

4.  Simultaneous tracking of coevolving distributional regularities in speech.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Phonetic recalibration does not depend on working memory.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Degrading phonetic information affects matching of audiovisual speech in adults, but not in infants.

Authors:  Martijn Baart; Jean Vroomen; Kathleen Shaw; Heather Bortfeld
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-10-18

7.  The effects of visual training on multisensory temporal processing.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Magdalena M Wilson; Albert R Powers; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Predictive coding and multisensory integration: an attentional account of the multisensory mind.

Authors:  Durk Talsma
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-26

Review 9.  Sources of Confusion in Infant Audiovisual Speech Perception Research.

Authors:  Kathleen E Shaw; Heather Bortfeld
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-15

10.  Speech is not special… again.

Authors:  Kathy M Carbonell; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.