Literature DB >> 19059185

Who are surgery program directors and what do they need?

Tania K Arora1, Brian J Kaplan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study are to define the demographics of program directors (PDs), characterize professional responsibilities and scholarly activities, assess career goals and perceptions, and determine what resources PDs have and how they use them.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, confidential, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, Internet-based survey was sent to general surgery PDs. PDs were identified from lists of known residencies from the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS) and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). E-mail follow-up was used to contact nonresponders and partial responders. Demographic data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: The response rate was 58%. The mean age was 51.3 +/- 8.2 years. Most respondents were male (89.7%), Caucasian (86.9%), and fellowship trained (63.7%). Few PDs have teaching credentials (11%), but most PDs have sought additional training in teaching (63%). PDs work a total of 73 hours per week. They spend about 41 hours per week on clinical duties and about 22 hours per week on program director duties. PDs have an average of 4-5 support staff members; 81.5% of PDs have an assistant program director (APD). A few PDs have formal protected time (38.7%). Most PDs feel they have support for professional development and feel supported by their chairperson (90.8% and 94.1%, respectively). Lower job satisfaction scores were observed in measures of feeling valued by colleagues and in the availability of institutional resources.
CONCLUSION: Most surgery PDs are fellowship trained, are currently conducting research, have an APD in their program, and feel supported by their chairperson. Most PDs do not have protected time, and some feel insufficient institutional resources are available for their responsibilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19059185     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2008.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  4 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to Implementing the ACGME Outcome Project: A Systematic Review of Program Director Surveys.

Authors:  Mohammad U Malik; David A Diaz Voss Varela; Charles M Stewart; Kulsoom Laeeq; Gayane Yenokyan; Howard W Francis; Nasir I Bhatti
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-12

2.  Results from a transitional-year program director survey: identifying crucial issues and concerns.

Authors:  Steven R Craig; Hayden L Smith; Matthew W Short
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-03

3.  "We've Really Built Something": Why Family Medicine Program Directors Stay in Their Positions-A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Douglas H Fernald; Christina M Hester; Steven R Brown
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-08

4.  New start of surgical residents training: the first survey of program directors in Korea.

Authors:  Sung Geun Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.