BACKGROUND: Much has been written about the influences of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work restrictions, the litigious climate in American medicine, and the proliferation of subspecialty fellowships on general surgery training. Few previous studies have addressed general surgical residents' perceptions of surgical training on a national level. METHODS: A 38-question Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent via e-mail to the program directors at all ACGME-approved general surgical training programs for distribution to categorical general surgery residents. Voluntary responses to statements focusing on job satisfaction, quality of life, and the influences of operative experience, work hours, fellows, physician extenders, as well as faculty and administration on resident training were solicited. RESULTS: Overall, 997 responses were received from residents of all clinical levels from 40 states. Most respondents were from university-based programs (79%) with a broad representation of program sizes (mean of 6 graduates per year; range 2 to 11). Residents believe that they will be prepared to enter clinical practice at the conclusion of their training (86%), that the duration of surgical training is adequate (85%), and that they are exposed to sufficient case volume and complexity (85% and 84%, respectively). Only 360 respondents (36%) believe that they are financially compensated appropriately. Although most respondents support the ACGME work-hour restrictions (70%), far fewer feel that they improve their training or patient care (46.6% and 46.8%, respectively). Most respondents are proud to be surgical residents (88%), view surgery as a rewarding profession (87%), and would choose surgery as a profession again (77%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical residents are positive regarding the quality of their training and life, although they feel poorly compensated for their work. Most residents intend to pursue fellowship training. Survey responses were consistent irrespective of gender, ethnicity, and program type.
BACKGROUND: Much has been written about the influences of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work restrictions, the litigious climate in American medicine, and the proliferation of subspecialty fellowships on general surgery training. Few previous studies have addressed general surgical residents' perceptions of surgical training on a national level. METHODS: A 38-question Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent via e-mail to the program directors at all ACGME-approved general surgical training programs for distribution to categorical general surgery residents. Voluntary responses to statements focusing on job satisfaction, quality of life, and the influences of operative experience, work hours, fellows, physician extenders, as well as faculty and administration on resident training were solicited. RESULTS: Overall, 997 responses were received from residents of all clinical levels from 40 states. Most respondents were from university-based programs (79%) with a broad representation of program sizes (mean of 6 graduates per year; range 2 to 11). Residents believe that they will be prepared to enter clinical practice at the conclusion of their training (86%), that the duration of surgical training is adequate (85%), and that they are exposed to sufficient case volume and complexity (85% and 84%, respectively). Only 360 respondents (36%) believe that they are financially compensated appropriately. Although most respondents support the ACGME work-hour restrictions (70%), far fewer feel that they improve their training or patient care (46.6% and 46.8%, respectively). Most respondents are proud to be surgical residents (88%), view surgery as a rewarding profession (87%), and would choose surgery as a profession again (77%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical residents are positive regarding the quality of their training and life, although they feel poorly compensated for their work. Most residents intend to pursue fellowship training. Survey responses were consistent irrespective of gender, ethnicity, and program type.