Literature DB >> 19058981

Splanchnic microcirculation protection by hydroxyethyl starches during abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

A Mahmood1, P Gosling, R Barclay, F Kilvington, R Vohra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To specifically compare the effect of two hydroxyethyl starches (HES) on the splanchnic microcirculation and systemic inflammation during abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomised study was carried out on 62 patients who received HES of molecular-weight 200 kDa (HES200/0.62), 130 kDa (HES130/0.4) or gelatine for 24h peri-operatively. Gastric-mucosal pHi (GpHi) and anti-endotoxin antibody were used as markers of splanchnic perfusion and endotoxaemia respectively. C-reactive protein (CRP) and lung-injury score (LIS) were used as markers of systemic inflammation and end-organ dysfunction respectively. Data was collected prospectively.
RESULTS: The drop in GpHi was least with HES200/0.62 compared to HES130/0.4 and gelatine at reperfusion (7.32 vs 7.28 and 7.28, p=0.017 and 0.009 respectively) and compared to gelatine at 2h as well (7.43 vs 7.28, p=0.001). GpHi dropped less with HES130/0.4 compared to gelatine at 2h (7.39 vs 7.28, p=0.002). Endotoxaemia increased only with gelatine. CRP was lower with HES200/0.62 (178 mg/mL) than gelatine (221 mg/mL) and HES130/0.4 (223 mg/mL) at 48 h (p=0.049 and p=0.009 respectively). There was no difference in LIS but ventilation duration was less with HES200/0.62 compared with gelatine (4 vs 11h, p=0.012).
CONCLUSION: During AAA surgery, HES200/0.62 provides the best splanchnic microcirculation protection, also reducing inflammation and duration of ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19058981     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  8 in total

Review 1.  The impact of fluid therapy on microcirculation and tissue oxygenation in hypovolemic patients: a review.

Authors:  Joachim Boldt; Can Ince
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The use of pulse pressure variation for predicting impairment of microcirculatory blood flow.

Authors:  Christoph R Behem; Michael F Graessler; Till Friedheim; Rahel Kluttig; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Anna Duprée; E Sebastian Debus; Daniel A Reuter; Sabine H Wipper; Constantin J C Trepte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Intravenous Fluid of Choice in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Seechad Noonpradej; Osaree Akaraborworn
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2020-08-03

Review 4.  Intravenous fluids for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Patiparn Toomtong; Sirilak Suksompong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

5.  An evaluation of the effects of perioperatively administered fluids on ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  S Ozciftci; M Gamli; D Ornek; E Horasanli; B Dikmen; O Canpolat; M Z Ciraci; O Kilci
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 6.  Microcirculation during surgery.

Authors:  Karam Nam; Yunseok Jeon
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2022-01-21

7.  Effects of infusion of different fluids during controlled hypotension on gastric intramucosal pH and postoperative gastroenterological function.

Authors:  Guanglei Wang; Su Liu; Gongjian Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-05

8.  Effects of different types of fluid resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock on splanchnic organ microcirculation and renal reactive oxygen species formation.

Authors:  Chun-Yu Wu; Kuang-Cheng Chan; Ya-Jung Cheng; Yu-Chang Yeh; Chiang-Ting Chien
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.