Literature DB >> 19058072

Tumor board: more than treatment planning--a 1-year prospective survey.

Troy A Gatcliffe1, Robert L Coleman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gynecologic oncology tumor boards (TBs) on patient care and graduate education.
METHODS: Sequential TBs were prospectively recorded. Case presentations preceded review of diagnostic studies and pathology. Following consultative dialogue, treatment plans were synthesized. Disposition alterations were categorized as major, minor, or none.
RESULTS: In 52 weekly TBs, 153 patients were presented. Alterations were made in 53 cases. Major alterations (n = 13) predominantly resulted from pathology reassignments. Minor alterations (n = 40) resulted from pathology, staging, radiology, and surgical team clarifications.
CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary TBs provide important information for prospective treatment planning and a significant educational opportunity for postgraduate trainees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19058072     DOI: 10.1080/08858190802189014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  6 in total

1.  Opportunities unexplored. The tumor conference.

Authors:  D E Henson
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Tumor board in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  J T Santoso; B Schwertner; R L Coleman; E V Hannigan
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Results of a national survey of characteristics of hospital tumor conferences.

Authors:  D E Henson; R W Frelick; L G Ford; C R Smart; D Winchester; C Mettlin; J W Yates
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-01

4.  Beyond doughnuts: tumor board recommendations influence patient care.

Authors:  John K Petty; John T Vetto
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Educational characteristics of tumor conferences in teaching and non-teaching hospitals.

Authors:  S E Radecki; J G Nyquist; J D Gates; S Abrahamson; D E Henson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Tumor board formats: "fascinating case" versus "working conference".

Authors:  J T Vetto; K Richert-Boe; M Desler; L DuFrain; H Hagen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.037

  6 in total
  19 in total

1.  Is there a role for clinical practice guidelines in multidisciplinary tumor board meetings? A descriptive study of knowledge transfer between research and practice.

Authors:  Xanthoula Kostaras; Melissa A Shea-Budgell; Emily Malcolm; Jacob C Easaw; Wilson Roa; Neil A Hagen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Multidisciplinary management of cancer patients: chasing a shadow or real value? An overview of the literature.

Authors:  J M Croke; S El-Sayed
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Multidisciplinary care in the oncology setting: historical perspective and data from lung and gynecology multidisciplinary clinics.

Authors:  Laura Elise Horvath; Edgardo Yordan; Deepak Malhotra; Ileana Leyva; Katy Bortel; Denise Schalk; Patricia Mellinger; Marianne Huml; Christy Kesslering; Jeffrey Huml
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Tumor boards: beyond the patient care conference.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Jazieh
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Multidisciplinary teams in thoracic oncology-from tragic to strategic.

Authors:  Krishnamachar Harish; Agrahara Sreenivasa Kirthi Koushik
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-05

6.  Assessing the effectiveness of a Grand Rounds CME activity for health-care professionals.

Authors:  Terry Ann Glauser; P Holder Nevins; J Chad Williamson; Brian Tomlinson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Tumor board participation among physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Mary Beth Landrum; Katherine L Kahn; Stacy W Gray; Aileen B Chen; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 8.  Lung cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Federico Venuta; Daniele Diso; Ilaria Onorati; Marco Anile; Sara Mantovani; Erino A Rendina
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Influence of a multidisciplinary cancer board on treatment decisions.

Authors:  Kenji Nemoto; Misako Murakami; Mayumi Ichikawa; Ibuki Ohta; Takuma Nomiya; Mayumi Yamakawa; Yuriko Itho; Tadahisa Fukui; Takashi Yoshioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The need for assessment and reassessment of the hospital cancer conference.

Authors:  Frederick L Greene
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.