OBJECTIVES: Although positron emission tomography (PET) using F-fluorodeoxy-glucose (FDG) frequently gives false-negative results for slow-growing tumors, C-acetate (AC)-PET has been reported to be able to detect them. To determine the usefulness of AC-PET for imaging non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), the sensitivity and specificity were compared between the AC-PET and FDG-PET with a multicenter study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 284 pulmonary lesions (227 NSCLCs and 57 benign lesions) were examined using both AC-PET and FDG-PET before surgery at seven Japanese institutes. The AC- or FDG-uptake in each lesion were quantitatively measured using the contrast ratio of the standard uptake value between the lesions and the contralateral lung. RESULTS: The sensitivity of AC-PET for diagnosing NSCLC was 0.71, which was significantly higher than the value of 0.57 obtained by FDG-PET (p < 0.001). No significant difference in the specificity was seen between AC- and FDG-PET. For the 146 well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, the sensitivity of AC-PET was 0.62, which was significantly higher than the value of 0.37 obtained by FDG-PET (p < 0.001). Of the 51 moderately- or poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas and 30 nonadenocarcinomas, there was no significant difference of sensitivity between AC- and FDG-PET. CONCLUSIONS: AC-PET could be used in place of FDG-PET for imaging NSCLC, with higher sensitivity for well-differentiated adenocarcinoma compared with FDG-PET.
OBJECTIVES: Although positron emission tomography (PET) using F-fluorodeoxy-glucose (FDG) frequently gives false-negative results for slow-growing tumors, C-acetate (AC)-PET has been reported to be able to detect them. To determine the usefulness of AC-PET for imaging non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), the sensitivity and specificity were compared between the AC-PET and FDG-PET with a multicenter study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 284 pulmonary lesions (227 NSCLCs and 57 benign lesions) were examined using both AC-PET and FDG-PET before surgery at seven Japanese institutes. The AC- or FDG-uptake in each lesion were quantitatively measured using the contrast ratio of the standard uptake value between the lesions and the contralateral lung. RESULTS: The sensitivity of AC-PET for diagnosing NSCLC was 0.71, which was significantly higher than the value of 0.57 obtained by FDG-PET (p < 0.001). No significant difference in the specificity was seen between AC- and FDG-PET. For the 146 well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, the sensitivity of AC-PET was 0.62, which was significantly higher than the value of 0.37 obtained by FDG-PET (p < 0.001). Of the 51 moderately- or poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas and 30 nonadenocarcinomas, there was no significant difference of sensitivity between AC- and FDG-PET. CONCLUSIONS:AC-PET could be used in place of FDG-PET for imaging NSCLC, with higher sensitivity for well-differentiated adenocarcinoma compared with FDG-PET.
Authors: Sarah A Comerford; Zhiguang Huang; Xinlin Du; Yun Wang; Ling Cai; Agnes K Witkiewicz; Holly Walters; Mohammed N Tantawy; Allie Fu; H Charles Manning; Jay D Horton; Robert E Hammer; Steven L McKnight; Benjamin P Tu Journal: Cell Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Ilaria Grassi; Cristina Nanni; Vincenzo Allegri; Joshua James Morigi; Gian Carlo Montini; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-12-15