Literature DB >> 19056214

Latex-free gloves: safer for whom?

Ehab Aldlyami1, Ashwin Kulkarni, Michael R Reed, Scott D Muller, Paul F Partington.   

Abstract

Increasing latex hypersensitivity among patients and health care workers has prompted the development of latex-free surgical gloves. Latex-free gloves must perform equally as the existing latex standard. We analyzed perforation rates in a clinical trial comparing latex and a latex-free alternative during primary hip and knee arthroplasty. The overall latex glove perforation rate was 8.4% compared with 21.6% for the latex-free alternative (chi(2) P < .001). The operation perforation rate for latex gloves was 34.4% compared with 80% for latex-free gloves (chi(2) P < .001). We suggest that the latex-free glove tested cannot provide a reliable barrier between the surgeon and the patient. As such, we question the safety of these gloves and the standards sets by the regulators. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19056214     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

1.  Grip in wet environments.

Authors:  C E Forbes-Haley; P Bahal; P A King
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Reducing surgical site infection in arthroplasty of the lower limb: A multi-disciplinary approach.

Authors:  R Johnson; S S Jameson; R D Sanders; N J Sargant; S D Muller; R M D Meek; M R Reed
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.853

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.