Literature DB >> 19056185

Conformal arc radiotherapy for prostate cancer: increased biochemical failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning computed tomogram despite image guidance by implanted markers.

Benedikt Engels1, Guy Soete, D Verellen, Guy Storme.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of rectal distention on the planning computed tomogram on freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) of prostate cancer patients treated with image-guided conformal arc radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The outcomes of 238 patients with T1-T3N0M0 tumors were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 53 months (range, 24-93 months). In 213 patients, daily co-registration of X-rays and digitally reconstructed radiographs was used for positioning, whereas in 25 patients positioning was done using direct prostate visualization with implanted markers. The rectal average cross-sectional area was determined on the planning computed tomogram.
RESULTS: The 5-year freedom from Grade 3 to 4 late gastrointestinal and urinary side effect, according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria, was 100% and 99.4% respectively. The 5-year FFBF was 88.4%. On multivariate analysis the following variables were significantly related to worse FFBF: risk group according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (high- to very high risk vs. intermediate- to low-risk), dose (70 vs. 78 Gy), average cross-sectional area (> or =16 vs. <16 cm(2)) and, unexpectedly, the use of implanted markers as opposed to bony structures for patient positioning. In retrospect, the margins around the clinical target volume appeared to be inadequate in the cases in which markers were used.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the outcome of patients treated with image-guided conformal arc radiotherapy is excellent. We were able to confirm the negative prognostic impact of a distended rectum on the planning computed tomogram described by others. The study illustrates the potential danger of image guidance techniques as to margin reduction around the clinical target volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19056185     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  47 in total

1.  Consideration of the likely benefit from implementation of prostate image-guided radiotherapy using current margin sizes: a radiobiological analysis.

Authors:  G S J Tudor; Y L Rimmer; T B Nguyen; M A Cowen; S J Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Electronic portal imaging vs kilovoltage imaging in fiducial marker image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: an analysis of set-up uncertainties.

Authors:  S Gill; J Thomas; C Fox; T Kron; A Thompson; S Chander; S Williams; K H Tai; G Duchesne; F Foroudi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  W Kurre; A Berlis; H-C Diener; J Fiehler; R Gold; C Groden; G F Hamann; J Röther; B Eckert
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  In vivo reproducibility of robotic probe placement for a novel ultrasound-guided radiation therapy system.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; H Tutkun Sen; Iulian Iordachita; Peter Kazanzides; John Wong
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-07-23

5.  Which bowel preparation is best? Comparison of a high-fibre diet leaflet, daily microenema and no preparation in prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy to assess the effect on planned target volume shifts due to rectal distension.

Authors:  S Yahya; A Zarkar; E Southgate; P Nightingale; G Webster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Amy S Harrison; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Timothy N Showalter; Mark D Hurwitz; Adam P Dicker; Robert B Den
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  [Radiotherapy with rectangular fields compared to conformal fields. Fewer clinical failures in high-risk prostate cancer patients].

Authors:  A Dal Pra; D M Aebersold
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 8.  kV cone-beam CT-based IGRT: a clinical review.

Authors:  Judit Boda-Heggemann; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Modeling positioning uncertainties of prostate cancer external beam radiation therapy using pre-treatment data.

Authors:  Per Munck af Rosenschöld; Neil B Desai; Jung Hun Oh; Aditya Apte; Margie Hunt; Abraham Kalikstein; James Mechalakos; Laura Happersett; Joseph O Deasy; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  The value of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy in challenging clinical settings.

Authors:  S J Treece; M Mukesh; Y L Rimmer; S J Tudor; J C Dean; R J Benson; D L Gregory; G Horan; S J Jefferies; S G Russell; M V Williams; C B Wilson; N G Burnet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.