Literature DB >> 19056086

A new method to normalize plantar pressure measurements for foot size and foot progression angle.

N L W Keijsers1, N M Stolwijk, B Nienhuis, J Duysens.   

Abstract

Plantar pressure measurement provides important information about the structure and function of the foot and is a helpful tool to evaluate patients with foot complaints. In general, average and maximum plantar pressure of 6-11 areas under the foot are used to compare groups of subjects. However, masking the foot means a loss of important information about the plantar pressure distribution pattern. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and test a simple method that normalizes the plantar pressure pattern for foot size, foot progression angle, and total plantar pressure. Moreover, scaling the plantar pressure to a standard foot opens the door for more sophisticated analysis techniques such as pattern recognition and machine learning. Twelve subjects walked at preferred and half of the preferred walking speed over a pressure plate. To test the method, subjects walked in a straight line and in an approaching angle of approximately 40 degrees . To calculate the normalized foot, the plantar pressure pattern was rotated over the foot progression angle and normalized for foot size. After normalization, the mean shortest distance between the contour lines of straight walking and walking at an angle had a mean of 0.22 cm (SD: 0.06 cm) for the forefoot and 0.14 cm (SD: 0.06 cm) for the heel. In addition, the contour lines of normalized feet for the various subjects were almost identical. The proposed method appeared to be successful in aligning plantar pressure of various feet without losing information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19056086     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

1.  Novel framework for registration of pedobarographic image data.

Authors:  Francisco P M Oliveira; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Spatio-temporal alignment of pedobarographic image sequences.

Authors:  Francisco P M Oliveira; Andreia Sousa; Rubim Santos; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Enhanced spatio-temporal alignment of plantar pressure image sequences using B-splines.

Authors:  Francisco P M Oliveira; João Manuel R S Tavares
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Geometric morphometric footprint analysis of young women.

Authors:  Jacqueline Domjanic; Martin Fieder; Horst Seidler; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Screening method based on walking plantar impulse for detecting musculoskeletal senescence and injury.

Authors:  Yifang Fan; Yubo Fan; Zhiyu Li; Tony Newman; Changsheng Lv; Yi Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Analysis of Plantar Pressure Data Based on Multimodel Method in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency during Walking.

Authors:  Xiaoli Li; Hongshi Huang; Jie Wang; Yuanyuan Yu; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison of plantar pressure distribution between three different shoes and three common movements in futsal.

Authors:  Meghdad Teymouri; Farzin Halabchi; Maryam Mirshahi; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Ali Mousavi Ahranjani; Amir Sadeghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Design and implementation of a BSN-based system for plantar health evaluation with exercise load quantification.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Zhiwen Liu; Jian Yang; Shaodong Ma
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Flat feet, happy feet? Comparison of the dynamic plantar pressure distribution and static medial foot geometry between Malawian and Dutch adults.

Authors:  Niki M Stolwijk; Jacques Duysens; Jan Willem K Louwerens; Yvonne Hm van de Ven; Noël Lw Keijsers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intra-subject sample size effects in plantar pressure analyses.

Authors:  Juliet McClymont; Russell Savage; Todd C Pataky; Robin Crompton; James Charles; Karl T Bates
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.