OBJECTIVES: We studied whether an increase in adenosine dose overcomes caffeine antagonism on adenosine-mediated coronary vasodilation. BACKGROUND: Caffeine is a competitive antagonist at the adenosine receptors, but it is unclear whether caffeine in coffee alters the actions of exogenous adenosine, and whether the antagonism can be surmounted by increasing the adenosine dose. METHODS: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) was used to assess adenosine-induced hyperemia in 30 patients before (baseline) and after coffee ingestion (caffeine). At baseline, patients received 140 microg/kg/min of adenosine combined with low-level exercise. For the caffeine study, 12 patients received 140 microg/kg/min of adenosine (standard) and 18 patients received 210 microg/kg/min (high dose) after caffeine intake (200 mg). Myocardial perfusion was assessed semiquantitatively and quantitatively, and perfusion defect was characterized according to the presence of reversibility. RESULTS: Caffeine reduced the magnitude of perfusion abnormality induced by standard adenosine as measured by the summed difference score (SDS) (12.0 +/- 4.4 at baseline vs. 4.1 +/- 2.1 after caffeine, p < 0.001) as well as defect size (18% [3% to 38%] vs. 8% [0% to 22%], p < 0.01), whereas it had no effect on the abnormalities caused by high-dose adenosine (SDS, 7.7 +/- 4.0 at baseline vs. 7.8 +/- 4.2 after caffeine, p = 0.7). There was good agreement between baseline and caffeine studies for segmental defect category (kappa = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.65 to 0.79) in the high-dose group. An increase in adenosine after caffeine intake was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Caffeine in coffee attenuates adenosine-induced coronary hyperemia and, consequently, the detection of perfusion abnormality by adenosine MPS. This can be overcome by increasing the adenosine dose without compromising test tolerability.
OBJECTIVES: We studied whether an increase in adenosine dose overcomes caffeine antagonism on adenosine-mediated coronary vasodilation. BACKGROUND:Caffeine is a competitive antagonist at the adenosine receptors, but it is unclear whether caffeine in coffee alters the actions of exogenous adenosine, and whether the antagonism can be surmounted by increasing the adenosine dose. METHODS: Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) was used to assess adenosine-induced hyperemia in 30 patients before (baseline) and after coffee ingestion (caffeine). At baseline, patients received 140 microg/kg/min of adenosine combined with low-level exercise. For the caffeine study, 12 patients received 140 microg/kg/min of adenosine (standard) and 18 patients received 210 microg/kg/min (high dose) after caffeine intake (200 mg). Myocardial perfusion was assessed semiquantitatively and quantitatively, and perfusion defect was characterized according to the presence of reversibility. RESULTS:Caffeine reduced the magnitude of perfusion abnormality induced by standard adenosine as measured by the summed difference score (SDS) (12.0 +/- 4.4 at baseline vs. 4.1 +/- 2.1 after caffeine, p < 0.001) as well as defect size (18% [3% to 38%] vs. 8% [0% to 22%], p < 0.01), whereas it had no effect on the abnormalities caused by high-dose adenosine (SDS, 7.7 +/- 4.0 at baseline vs. 7.8 +/- 4.2 after caffeine, p = 0.7). There was good agreement between baseline and caffeine studies for segmental defect category (kappa = 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.65 to 0.79) in the high-dose group. An increase in adenosine after caffeine intake was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS:Caffeine in coffee attenuates adenosine-induced coronary hyperemia and, consequently, the detection of perfusion abnormality by adenosineMPS. This can be overcome by increasing the adenosine dose without compromising test tolerability.
Authors: Joseph C Lee; John F Fraser; Adrian G Barnett; Leslie P Johnson; Melinda G Wilson; Catherine M McHenry; Darren L Walters; Christopher R Warnholtz; Frederick A Khafagi Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Furqan H Tejani; Randall C Thompson; Ami E Iskandrian; Bruce E McNutt; Billy Franks Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Theodoros D Karamitsos; Ntobeko A B Ntusi; Jane M Francis; Cameron J Holloway; Saul G Myerson; Stefan Neubauer Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Jennifer Xu; Wenjun Fan; Matthew J Budoff; Susan R Heckbert; Ezra A Amsterdam; Alvaro Alonso; Nathan D Wong Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2019-06-30