OBJECTIVE: The isolated use of Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) may fail for advanced haemorrhoids (HR; grades III and IV). Suture haemorrhoidopexy (SHP) and mucopexy by rectoanal repair (RAR) result in haemorrhoidal lifting and fixation. A prospective evaluation was performed to evaluate the results of DGHAL combined with adjunctive procedures. METHOD: The study included 147 patients with HR (male patients: 102; grade III: 95, grade IV: 52) presenting with bleeding (73%) and prolapse (62%). RESULTS: More ligations were required for grade IV than grade III HR (10.7 + 2.8 vs 8.6 + 2.2, P < 0.001). SHP (28 patients) and RAR (18 patients) at 1-4 positions were deemed necessary in 46 (31%) patients. Minimal (muco-)cutaneous excision (MMCE) was added in 23 patients. SHP/RAR was applied more frequently in grade IV HR (60%vs 16%, P < 0.001). In patients not having MMCE, SHP/RAR was added in 57% of grade IV cases (P < 0.001). Complications included residual prolapse (10; two second surgery), bleeding (15; two second DGHAL), thrombosis (four), fissure (three) and fistula (one). Analgesia was required not at all, up to 1-3 days, 4-7 days and >7 days by 30%, 31%, 16% and 14% of the patients, respectively. SHP/RAR was associated with greater discomfort (17%vs 6%, P < 0.001). No differences were found between SHP and RAR. At an average follow-up of 15 months, 96% of patients were asymptomatic and 95% were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: DGHAL with the selective application of SHP/RAR is a safe and effective technique for advanced grade HR.
OBJECTIVE: The isolated use of Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DGHAL) may fail for advanced haemorrhoids (HR; grades III and IV). Suture haemorrhoidopexy (SHP) and mucopexy by rectoanal repair (RAR) result in haemorrhoidal lifting and fixation. A prospective evaluation was performed to evaluate the results of DGHAL combined with adjunctive procedures. METHOD: The study included 147 patients with HR (male patients: 102; grade III: 95, grade IV: 52) presenting with bleeding (73%) and prolapse (62%). RESULTS: More ligations were required for grade IV than grade III HR (10.7 + 2.8 vs 8.6 + 2.2, P < 0.001). SHP (28 patients) and RAR (18 patients) at 1-4 positions were deemed necessary in 46 (31%) patients. Minimal (muco-)cutaneous excision (MMCE) was added in 23 patients. SHP/RAR was applied more frequently in grade IV HR (60%vs 16%, P < 0.001). In patients not having MMCE, SHP/RAR was added in 57% of grade IV cases (P < 0.001). Complications included residual prolapse (10; two second surgery), bleeding (15; two second DGHAL), thrombosis (four), fissure (three) and fistula (one). Analgesia was required not at all, up to 1-3 days, 4-7 days and >7 days by 30%, 31%, 16% and 14% of the patients, respectively. SHP/RAR was associated with greater discomfort (17%vs 6%, P < 0.001). No differences were found between SHP and RAR. At an average follow-up of 15 months, 96% of patients were asymptomatic and 95% were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: DGHAL with the selective application of SHP/RAR is a safe and effective technique for advanced grade HR.
Authors: G E Theodoropoulos; N V Michalopoulos; D Linardoutsos; P Stamopoulos; I Flessas; D Tsamis; G C Zografos Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2012-05-05 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Felix Aigner; Friedrich Conrad; Ingrid Haunold; Johann Pfeifer; Andreas Salat; Max Wunderlich; Rene Fortelny; Helga Fritsch; Markus Glöckler; Hubert Hauser; Andreas Heuberger; Judith Karner-Hanusch; Christoph Kopf; Peter Lechner; Stefan Riss; Sebastian Roka; Matthias Scheyer Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 1.704