BACKGROUND: Patients who have angioedema after taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) have been reported to develop angioedema when taking an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), but few studies quantify the risk. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and Current Contents, with no limitations from January 1990 to May 2007. Any article that described a cohort of patients who had angioedema after taking an ACE-I, were subsequently exposed to an ARB, and were followed for a least 1 month were included. The percentage of patients who had angioedema was abstracted from each article, and confidence intervals were calculated using the exact binomial method. The pooled percentage was calculated with the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Two-hundred fifty-four unique articles were identified, and 3 articles met inclusion criteria, which described 71 patients with the outcome of interest. One was a randomized controlled trial and 2 were retrospective cohorts. These articles described both confirmed and possible cases of angioedema. The risk of angioedema was 9.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.6%-17%) for possible cases and 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.0%-9.2%) for confirmed cases. No fatal events were reported. No statistical heterogeneity was reported between trials (P > .3). CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests that for patients who develop angioedema when taking an ACE-I, the risk of development of any subsequent angioedema when taking an ARB is between 2% and 17%; for confirmed angioedema, the risk is 0% to 9.2%. This information will aid clinicians in counseling patients regarding therapy options after development of angioedema due to ACE-Is.
BACKGROUND:Patients who have angioedema after taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) have been reported to develop angioedema when taking an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), but few studies quantify the risk. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, and Current Contents, with no limitations from January 1990 to May 2007. Any article that described a cohort of patients who had angioedema after taking an ACE-I, were subsequently exposed to an ARB, and were followed for a least 1 month were included. The percentage of patients who had angioedema was abstracted from each article, and confidence intervals were calculated using the exact binomial method. The pooled percentage was calculated with the inverse variance method. RESULTS: Two-hundred fifty-four unique articles were identified, and 3 articles met inclusion criteria, which described 71 patients with the outcome of interest. One was a randomized controlled trial and 2 were retrospective cohorts. These articles described both confirmed and possible cases of angioedema. The risk of angioedema was 9.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.6%-17%) for possible cases and 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.0%-9.2%) for confirmed cases. No fatal events were reported. No statistical heterogeneity was reported between trials (P > .3). CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests that for patients who develop angioedema when taking an ACE-I, the risk of development of any subsequent angioedema when taking an ARB is between 2% and 17%; for confirmed angioedema, the risk is 0% to 9.2%. This information will aid clinicians in counseling patients regarding therapy options after development of angioedema due to ACE-Is.
Authors: Jisha Joshua; Eric Scholten; Daniel Schaerer; Mahmood F Mafee; Thomas H Alexander; Laura E Crotty Alexander Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2018-06
Authors: Joseph J Moellman; Jonathan A Bernstein; Christopher Lindsell; Aleena Banerji; Paula J Busse; Carlos A Camargo; Sean P Collins; Timothy J Craig; William R Lumry; Richard Nowak; Jesse M Pines; Ali S Raja; Marc Riedl; Michael J Ward; Bruce L Zuraw; Deborah Diercks; Brian Hiestand; Ronna L Campbell; Sandra Schneider; Richard Sinert Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Adriana Krizova; Taylor Gardner; D'Arcy L Little; V Arcieri-Piersanti; Michael S Pollanen Journal: Forensic Sci Med Pathol Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 2.007