Literature DB >> 19054900

Word of mouth and physician referrals still drive health care provider choice.

Ha T Tu, Johanna R Lauer.   

Abstract

Sponsors of health care price and quality transparency initiatives often identify all consumers as their target audiences, but the true audiences for these programs are much more limited. In 2007, only 11 percent of American adults looked for a new primary care physician, 28 percent needed a new specialist physician and 16 percent underwent a medical procedure at a new facility, according to a new national study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC). Among consumers who found a new provider, few engaged in active shopping or considered price or quality information--especially when choosing specialists or facilities for medical procedures. When selecting new primary care physicians, half of all consumers relied on word-of-mouth recommendations from friends and relatives, but many also used doctor recommendations (38%) and health plan information (35%), and nearly two in five used multiple information sources when choosing a primary care physician. However, when choosing specialists and facilities for medical procedures, most consumers relied exclusively on physician referrals. Use of online provider information was low, ranging from 3 percent for consumers undergoing procedures to 7 percent for consumers choosing new specialists to 11 percent for consumers choosing new primary care physicians

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19054900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Brief


  22 in total

1.  The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Rachel O Reid; Partha Deb; Benjamin L Howell; Patrick H Conway; William H Shrank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Context-based strategies for engaging consumers with public reports about health care providers.

Authors:  Dale Shaller; David E Kanouse; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  A framework for guiding efforts to reward value instead of volume.

Authors:  Taylor J Christensen
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-11-07

4.  Helping Consumers Make High-Value Health Care Choices: The Devil Is in the Details.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Kullgren
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  How Men with Prostate Cancer Choose Specialists: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Tammy Jiang; Christian H Stillson; Craig Evan Pollack; Linda Crossette; Michelle Ross; Archana Radhakrishnan; David Grande
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Hospital racial composition and the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Justin E Bekelman; K J Liao; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Disparities in Caregivers' Experiences at the Dentist With Their Young Child.

Authors:  Stephanie M Reich; Wendy Ochoa; Amy Gaona; Yesenia Salcedo; Georgina Espino Bardales; Veronica Newhart; Joyce Lin; Guadalupe Díaz
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.107

8.  Effects of patient-centered medical home attributes on patients' perceptions of quality in federally supported health centers.

Authors:  Lydie A Lebrun-Harris; Leiyu Shi; Jinsheng Zhu; Matthew T Burke; Alek Sripipatana; Quyen Ngo-Metzger
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Factors that influence provider selection for elective total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; David Kaufman; Vanessa C Chan; Stephanie Caminiti; Courtland Lewis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.

Authors:  Alexander T Yahanda; Kelly J Lafaro; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.