Literature DB >> 19054583

Atelectasis of the middle ear in pediatric patients: safety of surgical intervention.

Johannes Borgstein1, Tatjana Gerritsma, Iain Bruce, Louw Feenstra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus amongst clinicians regarding the best treatment strategy for pediatric atelectasis of the middle ear. It is the policy in our pediatric otolaryngology department to intervene early in the disease process. In an attempt to provide evidence regarding the safety of early intervention we have analyzed the audiological outcome following surgery in different stages of the disease. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case note review.
METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study of children with atelectasis treated surgically at a Dutch tertiary referral centre. Disease severity was classified according to the Erasmus Classification of Pediatric Atelectasis, and pre- and postoperative four frequency ac and bc thresholds were compared.
RESULTS: The study group consisted of 169 ears in 127 patients. The mean age at surgery was 9.6 years. There was an improvement in the average air-bone gap (ABG) for all stages. No deterioration in mean bone conduction thresholds was found following surgical intervention and there were no dead ears postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that surgical intervention had a favourable effect on hearing level across all stages, though hearing was markedly worse in stage V, and that a policy of intervention early in the disease process cannot be rejected on the grounds of risk of iatrogenic sensorineural hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19054583     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  6 in total

Review 1.  Tympanic membrane retraction pocket staging: is it worthwhile?

Authors:  Musaed Alzahrani; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Transmeatal excision of pars tensa retraction pockets with simultaneous ventilation tube insertion in children: a prospective study.

Authors:  Gábor Ráth; Imre Gerlinger; Zsuzsanna Csákányi; Mónika Sultész; Veronika Gaál; Gábor Katona
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The Natural History of Asymptomatic Deep Pars Tensa Retraction.

Authors:  John Cutajar; Maryam Nowghani; Bharti Tulsidas-Mahtani; John Hamilton
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 4.  The Role of Cartilage-perichondrium Tympanoplasty in the Treatment of Tympanic Membrane Retractions: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Angelo Immordino; Federico Sireci; Francesco Lorusso; Francesco Martines; Francesco Dispenza
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-28

5.  The Natural Course of Tympanic Membrane Retractions in the Posterosuperior Quadrant of Pars Tensa: A Watchful Waiting Policy.

Authors:  Ahmed B Bayoumy; Christianne C A F M Veugen; L Bengt Rijssen; Matthew Yung; Jan-Willem M Bok
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.619

6.  Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed B Bayoumy; Christianne C A F M Veugen; Erwin L van der Veen; Jan-Willem M Bok; Jacob A de Ru; Hans G X M Thomeer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.503

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.