Peibin Yue1, James Turkson. 1. University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, Biomolecular Science Center, Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, 12722 Research Parkway, Orlando, FL 32826, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 occurs in many human tumors. Moreover, studies utilizing genetic and pharmacological approaches to modulate constitutive STAT3 activity have provided compelling evidence for the critical role of aberrant STAT3 activity in malignant transformation and tumor progression, and thereby validated STAT3 as a novel cancer drug target. OBJECTIVE: This review is intended to be a full coverage of the efforts to develop direct STAT3 inhibitors and will provide a discussion on the inhibitory modalities developed to date. METHODS: Review of the literature focused on the modalities and mechanisms that directly target and inhibit the STAT protein or its functions. RESULTS/ CONCLUSION: While a variety of STAT3 inhibitors have been identified that induce antitumor cell effects in vitro and in vivo, the landscape remains murky. With a few exceptions, most of the STAT3 inhibitors reported to date have not undergone an in vivo efficacy, pharmacology or toxicity testing. Also, there is no evidence, per the published literature of an impending clinical development for the few agents that were reported to exhibit in vivo efficacy. Overall, there is the need for a reassessment of the ongoing strategies to target STAT3 intended not only for refinement, but also for incorporating some new technologies to strengthen our efforts and ensure the success - sooner, rather than later - of identifying suitable anti-STAT3 agents for development into clinically useful anticancer therapeutics.
BACKGROUND: Aberrant activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 occurs in many humantumors. Moreover, studies utilizing genetic and pharmacological approaches to modulate constitutive STAT3 activity have provided compelling evidence for the critical role of aberrant STAT3 activity in malignant transformation and tumor progression, and thereby validated STAT3 as a novel cancer drug target. OBJECTIVE: This review is intended to be a full coverage of the efforts to develop direct STAT3 inhibitors and will provide a discussion on the inhibitory modalities developed to date. METHODS: Review of the literature focused on the modalities and mechanisms that directly target and inhibit the STAT protein or its functions. RESULTS/ CONCLUSION: While a variety of STAT3 inhibitors have been identified that induce antitumor cell effects in vitro and in vivo, the landscape remains murky. With a few exceptions, most of the STAT3 inhibitors reported to date have not undergone an in vivo efficacy, pharmacology or toxicity testing. Also, there is no evidence, per the published literature of an impending clinical development for the few agents that were reported to exhibit in vivo efficacy. Overall, there is the need for a reassessment of the ongoing strategies to target STAT3 intended not only for refinement, but also for incorporating some new technologies to strengthen our efforts and ensure the success - sooner, rather than later - of identifying suitable anti-STAT3 agents for development into clinically useful anticancer therapeutics.
Authors: Ramzi M Mohammad; Anton Scott Goustin; Amro Aboukameel; Ben Chen; Sanjeev Banerjee; Guoping Wang; Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska; Shaomeng Wang; Ayad Al-Katib Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-04-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A Pardanani; J Hood; T Lasho; R L Levine; M B Martin; G Noronha; C Finke; C C Mak; R Mesa; H Zhu; R Soll; D G Gilliland; A Tefferi Journal: Leukemia Date: 2007-05-31 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Michelle A Blaskovich; Jiazhi Sun; Alan Cantor; James Turkson; Richard Jove; Saïd M Sebti Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Bharat B Aggarwal; Gautam Sethi; Kwang Seok Ahn; Santosh K Sandur; Manoj K Pandey; Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Bokyung Sung; Haruyo Ichikawa Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Jeffrey J Talbot; Jonathan M Shillingford; Shivakumar Vasanth; Nicholas Doerr; Sambuddho Mukherjee; Mike T Kinter; Terry Watnick; Thomas Weimbs Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shreeram C Nallar; Sudhakar Kalakonda; Daniel J Lindner; Robert R Lorenz; Eric Lamarre; Xiao Weihua; Dhananjaya V Kalvakolanu Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Francisco Lopez-Tapia; Christine Brotherton-Pleiss; Peibin Yue; Heide Murakami; Ana Carolina Costa Araujo; Bruna Reis Dos Santos; Erin Ichinotsubo; Anna Rabkin; Raj Shah; Megan Lantz; Suzie Chen; Marcus A Tius; James Turkson Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 4.345