Literature DB >> 19053048

Diagnostic and prognostic values of noninvasive biomarkers of fibrosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease.

Sylvie Naveau1, Guillaume Gaudé, Amani Asnacios, Hélène Agostini, Annie Abella, Nadège Barri-Ova, Barbara Dauvois, Sophie Prévot, Yen Ngo, Mona Munteanu, Axel Balian, Micheline Njiké-Nakseu, Gabriel Perlemuter, Thierry Poynard.   

Abstract

FibroTest has been validated as a biomarker of fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, with a similar prognostic value as biopsy. The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic and prognostic values of FibroTest versus the recently patented biomarkers, FibrometerA, and Hepascore. A total of 218 consecutive patients with ALD and available liver biopsy examination were included. Biomarkers were compared using univariate area under the ROC curves (AUROC) and multivariate analysis (logistic regression and Cox). The median follow-up was 8.2 years. Eighty-five patients died, including 42 deaths related to liver complications. The diagnostic values of FibrometerA and Hepascore did not differ from that of FibroTest for advanced fibrosis (all AUROC = 0.83 +/- 0.03) and cirrhosis (FibroTest and FibrometerA = 0.94 +/- 0.02, Hepascore = 0.92 +/- 0.02), and were significantly greater than those of nonpatented biomarkers (APRI, Forns, FIB4; P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis the most significant was FibroTest (P = 0.001), without independent diagnostic value for FibrometerA (P = 0.19), and Hepascore (P = 0.40). The prognostic values of FibroTest (AUROC for survival or non liver disease-related death = 0.79 +/- 0.04), FibrometerA (0.80 +/- 0.04), Hepascore (0.78 +/- 0.04), did not differ from that of biopsy fibrosis staging (0.77 +/- 0.04). In multivariate analysis the most significant were FibroTest (P = 0.004) and biopsy (P = 0.03), without independent prognostic values for FibrometerA (P = 0.41) and Hepascore (P = 0.28). In patients with alcoholic liver disease, FibrometerA and Hepascore did not improve the diagnostic and prognostic values of FibroTest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19053048     DOI: 10.1002/hep.22576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  67 in total

1.  Noninvasive Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis: Clinical Applications and Future Directions.

Authors:  Daniel L Motola; Peter Caravan; Raymond T Chung; Bryan C Fuchs
Journal:  Curr Pathobiol Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

2.  Prognostic value of liver fibrosis biomarkers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thierry Poynard; Yen Ngo; Hugo Perazzo; Mona Munteanu; Pascal Lebray; Joseph Moussalli; Dominique Thabut; Yves Benhamou; Vlad Ratziu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-07

3.  Noninvasive serum models to predict significant liver related events in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Ragesh Babu Thandassery; Saad Al Kaabi; Madiha E Soofi; Benjamin Tharian; Rajvir Singh
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 4.  Clinical differences between alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Toshikuni; Mikihiro Tsutsumi; Tomiyasu Arisawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Relationship between alcohol use categories and noninvasive markers of advanced hepatic fibrosis in HIV-infected, chronic hepatitis C virus-infected, and uninfected patients.

Authors:  Joseph K Lim; Janet P Tate; Shawn L Fultz; Joseph L Goulet; Joseph Conigliaro; Kendall J Bryant; Adam J Gordon; Cynthia Gibert; David Rimland; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Marina B Klein; David A Fiellin; Amy C Justice; Vincent Lo Re
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Enhanced liver fibrosis test using ELISA assay accurately discriminates advanced stage of liver fibrosis as determined by transient elastography fibroscan in treatment naïve chronic HCV patients.

Authors:  Dalia Omran; Ayman Yosry; Samar K Darweesh; Mohammed M Nabeel; Mohammed El-Beshlawey; Sameh Saif; Azza Fared; Mohamed Hassany; Rania A Zayed
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 7.  Non-invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Suraj Sharma; Korosh Khalili; Geoffrey Christopher Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease.

Authors:  Rosa Lombardi; Elena Buzzetti; Davide Roccarina; Emmanuel A Tsochatzis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Prevalence of liver fibrosis and risk factors in a general population using non-invasive biomarkers (FibroTest).

Authors:  Thierry Poynard; Pascal Lebray; Patrick Ingiliz; Anne Varaut; Brigitte Varsat; Yen Ngo; Pascal Norha; Mona Munteanu; Fabienne Drane; Djamila Messous; Françoise Imbert Bismut; Jean Pierre Carrau; Julien Massard; Vlad Ratziu; Jean Pierre Giordanella
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Assessment of liver fibrosis: noninvasive means.

Authors:  Thierry Poynard; Rachel Morra; Patrick Ingiliz; Françoise Imbert-Bismut; Dominique Thabut; Djamila Messous; Mona Munteanu; Julien Massard; Yves Benhamou; Vlad Ratziu
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.