Literature DB >> 19052758

Caesarean or normal vaginal delivery: overview of physicians' self-preference and suggestion to patients.

Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh1, Alireza Rajabzadeh, Ali Saadati, Abolfazl Mahdanian, Narges Ashrafinia, Soghra Khazardoost, Sedigheh Borna, Maryam Maleki, Mamak Shariat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Caesarean delivery in the absence of any medical indications has become a major issue of concern among the women's health professionals. The patients' choice of caesarean is influenced by several factors predominating by their physicians' suggestion. Our objective was to examine factors that may affect the physicians' responses to patients consulting the mode of delivery.
METHODS: Questionnaires were posted to 1,000 female obstetricians and gynaecologists practicing in Tehran in winter 2007. Questionnaires included demographic information of physicians and their history of pregnancy and delivery. Finally, they were asked their preferred mode of delivery and the mode they suggest when being consulted by parturient.
RESULTS: From 1,000 physicians, 785 cases (78.5%) responded to the survey. The rate of responses in favour of suggesting normal vaginal delivery, Caesarean Section and painless vaginal delivery was 60.8, 25.6 and 13.6%, respectively. There was a correlation between the suggested and the preferred mode of delivery, it means that the physicians mostly suggested their self-preferred mode of delivery to their patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians normally suggest to their patients as the safe mode of delivery what they prefer for themselves. This preference and subsequent suggestion is influenced by different factors including their age, marital status, and previous modes of delivery. As conclusion, it is inferred that informing a physician to choose the right mode of delivery for herself leads to better suggestions to the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19052758     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-008-0858-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  6 in total

1.  Maternal Outcomes Associated with Caesarean versus Vaginal Delivery.

Authors:  Farnaz Zandvakili; Masomeh Rezaie; Roonak Shahoei; Daem Roshani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-07-01

2.  Medical students' personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study.

Authors:  Tatiane Watanabe; Roxana Knobel; Guilherme Suchard; Mario Julio Franco; Eleonora d'Orsi; Elenice Bertanha Consonni; Marcos Consonni
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Maternal demand for cesarean section: perception and willingness to request by Nigerian antenatal clients.

Authors:  Ngozi S Okonkwo; Oladosu A Ojengbede; Imran O Morhason-Bello; Babatunde O Adedokun
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-03-28

4.  Reasons for elective cesarean section in Iranian women.

Authors:  Zohreh Sadat
Journal:  Nurs Midwifery Stud       Date:  2014-09-20

5.  Women's perspectives on health facility and system levels factors influencing mode of delivery in Tehran: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Mahboube Shirzad; Elham Shakibazadeh; Ana Pilar Betran; Meghan A Bohren; Mehrandokht Abedini
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Trends in inequalities in utilization of reproductive health services from 2000 to 2011 in Vietnam.

Authors:  Nguyen Huu Chau Duc; Keiko Nakamura; Masashi Kizuki; Kaoruko Seino; Mosiur Rahman
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2015-12-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.