Van Anh Trinh1. 1. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Pharmacy, Melanoma and Sarcoma Medical Oncology, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 0377, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. vtrinh@mdanderson.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: Metastatic melanoma and current treatments are reviewed. SUMMARY: Despite the many advances in cancer treatment that have occurred over the last several decades, the prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma remains poor. The 5-year survival rate for patients with distant metastases is less than 10%. For these patients, surgery and radiation therapy are primarily used to palliate symptoms. Most patients with advanced melanoma receive systemic therapy. Single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy with dacarbazine is the standard of care in community practice, although the response rate is generally low and few patients attain complete remission. Temozolomide is an orally active congener of dacarbazine that is at least as effective as dacarbazine when used as single-agent cytotoxic therapy. Low-dose extended temozolomide regimens may provide greater antitumor efficacy. Combinations of dacarbazine or temozolomide with other cytotoxic therapies have not markedly improved patient survival. Newer agents (e.g., lomeguatrib and decitabine) have been developed to overcome mechanisms of drug resistance. Biotherapy using high-dose interleukin-2 has been shown to induce durable responses lasting 5 years or more in some patients, although the overall response rate is not substantially better than that with dacarbazine. Interferon alpha is also used for the treatment of metastatic melanoma, despite lack of approval by the FDA for this indication. Some evidence suggests that combining chemotherapy and biotherapy agents (biochemotherapy) increases the rate of treatment response but does not significantly extend overall survival. CONCLUSION: New strategies are needed to improve treatment response rates and duration of overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma.
PURPOSE: Metastatic melanoma and current treatments are reviewed. SUMMARY: Despite the many advances in cancer treatment that have occurred over the last several decades, the prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma remains poor. The 5-year survival rate for patients with distant metastases is less than 10%. For these patients, surgery and radiation therapy are primarily used to palliate symptoms. Most patients with advanced melanoma receive systemic therapy. Single-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy with dacarbazine is the standard of care in community practice, although the response rate is generally low and few patients attain complete remission. Temozolomide is an orally active congener of dacarbazine that is at least as effective as dacarbazine when used as single-agent cytotoxic therapy. Low-dose extended temozolomide regimens may provide greater antitumor efficacy. Combinations of dacarbazine or temozolomide with other cytotoxic therapies have not markedly improved patient survival. Newer agents (e.g., lomeguatrib and decitabine) have been developed to overcome mechanisms of drug resistance. Biotherapy using high-dose interleukin-2 has been shown to induce durable responses lasting 5 years or more in some patients, although the overall response rate is not substantially better than that with dacarbazine. Interferon alpha is also used for the treatment of metastatic melanoma, despite lack of approval by the FDA for this indication. Some evidence suggests that combining chemotherapy and biotherapy agents (biochemotherapy) increases the rate of treatment response but does not significantly extend overall survival. CONCLUSION: New strategies are needed to improve treatment response rates and duration of overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Authors: J Harrison Howard; John F Thompson; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Harald J Hoekstra; Daniel F Roses; Vernon K Sondak; Douglas S Reintgen; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Constantine P Karakousis; Brendon J Coventry; William G Kraybill; B Mark Smithers; Robert Elashoff; Stacey L Stern; Alistair J Cochran; Mark B Faries; Donald L Morton Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Pascale Dequen; Paul Lorigan; Jeroen P Jansen; Marc van Baardewijk; Mario J N M Ouwens; Srividya Kotapati Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-09-28
Authors: Laszlo G Radvanyi; Chantale Bernatchez; Minying Zhang; Patricia S Fox; Priscilla Miller; Jessica Chacon; Richard Wu; Gregory Lizee; Sandy Mahoney; Gladys Alvarado; Michelle Glass; Valen E Johnson; John D McMannis; Elizabeth Shpall; Victor Prieto; Nicholas Papadopoulos; Kevin Kim; Jade Homsi; Agop Bedikian; Wen-Jen Hwu; Sapna Patel; Merrick I Ross; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Anthony Lucci; Richard Royal; Janice N Cormier; Michael A Davies; Rahmatu Mansaray; Orenthial J Fulbright; Christopher Toth; Renjith Ramachandran; Seth Wardell; Audrey Gonzalez; Patrick Hwu Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark E McDonnell; Matthew D Vera; Benjamin E Blass; Jeffrey C Pelletier; Richard C King; Carmen Fernandez-Metzler; Garry R Smith; Jay Wrobel; Suzie Chen; Brian A Wall; Allen B Reitz Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Jeffrey C Pelletier; Suzie Chen; Haiyan Bian; Raj Shah; Garry R Smith; Jay E Wrobel; Allen B Reitz Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 4.345