Literature DB >> 19051866

The role of chlorhexidine in caries prevention.

Jaana Autio-Gold1.   

Abstract

The use of chlorhexidine for caries prevention has been a controversial topic among dental educators and clinicians. In several reviews, it has been concluded that the most persistent reduction of mutans streptococci have been achieved by chlorhexidine varnishes, followed by gels and, lastly, mouth rinses. Also, the evidence for using different chlorhexidine modes or a combination of chlorhexidine-fluoride therapy for caries prevention has been "suggestive but incomplete". Variable study designs and lack of data in high-risk children and adults support the need to continue conducting randomized, well-controlled clinical trials and to search for a practical, effective mode of antimicrobial treatment that augments the known effect of fluoride treatments. Currently, the only chlorhexidine-containing products marketed in the United States (US) are mouthrinses containing 0.12 percent chlorhexidine. Based on the available reviews, chlorhexidine rinses have not been highly effective in preventing caries, or at least the clinical data are not convincing. Due to the current lack of long-term clinical evidence for caries prevention and reported side effects, chlorhexidine rinses should not be recommended for caries prevention. Due to the inconclusive literature and sparse clinical data on gels and varnishes, their use for caries prevention should also be studied further to develop evidence-based recommendations for their clinical role in caries prevention. Since dental caries is a disease with a multifactoral etiology, it is currently more appropriate to use other established, evidence-based prevention methods, such as fluoride applications, diet modifications and good oral hygiene practices. Recent findings also indicate that the effect of an antimicrobial agent for reducing the levels of mutans streptococci or plaque reduction may not always correlate with eventual caries reduction. The clinically important outcome is proven reductions in caries. Many advances in the treatment and prevention of dental caries have been introduced over the past century. The use of chlorhexidine in caries prevention has been referred to as a nonsurgical management of dental caries and has represented the modern medical model of caries treatment. However, there is a lack of consensus on evidence-based treatment protocols and controversy regarding the role of chlorhexidine in caries prevention among dental educators and clinicians. There is a need to standardize guidelines to optimize evidence-based non-surgical disease management to provide appropriate care. This paper reviewed the literature on the effectiveness of different modes of chlorhexidine delivery for caries prevention and provides guidelines for chlorhexidine use in caries management. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases and the keywords "chlorhexidine" and "caries", limiting the search to "humans", "reviews" and "English". Based on the published reviews, it was concluded that chlorhexidine rinses, gels and varnishes or combinations of these items with fluoride have variable effects. Additionally, the sparse clinical data that was reported weakens the conclusions. Due to the current lack of evidence on long-term clinical outcomes and reported side effects, chlorhexidine rinse, which is currently the only treatment mode available in the US, should not be recommended for caries prevention. Clinical evidence on gels and varnishes is also inconclusive. For the treatment of dental caries, there are alternative evidence-based prevention methods available, such as fluoride applications, diet modifications and good oral hygiene practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19051866     DOI: 10.2341/08-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  49 in total

1.  Xylitol concentrations in artificial saliva after application of different xylitol dental varnishes.

Authors:  Agnes de Fátima Faustino Pereira; Thiago Cruvinel da Silva; Thelma Lopes da Silva; Magali de Lourdes Caldana; José Roberto Magalhães Bastos; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Efficacy of different strategies in protecting enamel against demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Michael Knösel; Linda Forslund; Klaus Jung; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparison of the Antibacterial Properties of Three Mouthwashes Containing Chlorhexidine Against Oral Microbial Plaques: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Hojatollah Yousefimanesh; Mansour Amin; Maryam Robati; Hamed Goodarzi; Masumeh Otoufi
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 0.747

4.  Effect of honey on Streptococcus mutans growth and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Hani M Nassar; Mingyun Li; Richard L Gregory
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Therapeutic Strategies Targeting Cariogenic Biofilm Microenvironment.

Authors:  Y Liu; Z Ren; G Hwang; H Koo
Journal:  Adv Dent Res       Date:  2018-02

6.  Spontaneously Arising Streptococcus mutans Variants with Reduced Susceptibility to Chlorhexidine Display Genetic Defects and Diminished Fitness.

Authors:  Justin R Kaspar; Matthew J Godwin; Irina M Velsko; Vincent P Richards; Robert A Burne
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Preferences for caries prevention agents in adult patients: findings from the dental practice-based research network.

Authors:  Joseph L Riley; Valeria V Gordan; D Brad Rindal; Jeffrey L Fellows; Craig T Ajmo; Craig Amundson; Gerald A Anderson; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.383

8.  An innovative approach to treating dental decay in children. A new anti-caries agent.

Authors:  Andréa Gadelha Ribeiro Targino; Miguel Angel Pelagio Flores; Valdeci Elias dos Santos Junior; Fabiana de Godoy Bené Bezerra; Hilzeth de Luna Freire; André Galembeck; Aronita Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Topical delivery of low-cost protein drug candidates made in chloroplasts for biofilm disruption and uptake by oral epithelial cells.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Aditya C Kamesh; Yuhong Xiao; Victor Sun; Michael Hayes; Henry Daniell; Hyun Koo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Effects of mouthrinses containing essential oils and alcohol-free chlorhexidine on human plaque acidogenicity.

Authors:  Katarina Wikén Albertsson; Anitha Persson; Peter Lingström; Jan W V van Dijken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.