Literature DB >> 19050976

Synchronous hepatic metastases from colon cancer: changing treatment strategies and results of surgical intervention.

Bridget N Fahy1, Michael D'Angelica, Ronald P DeMatteo, Leslie H Blumgart, Martin R Weiser, Irina Ostrovnaya, Mithat Gonen, William R Jarnagin.   

Abstract

More effective chemotherapeutic agents have broadened the role of hepatic resection in the management of patients with synchronous hepatic metastases from colon cancer. This study examines the management patterns and the role of hepatobiliary surgical evaluation in patients with synchronous stage IV colon cancer. Patients with synchronous hepatic metastases from colon cancer evaluated and treated from 1/99 to 11/04 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic, disease-related, and treatment-related variables were reviewed and correlated with disease-specific survival (DSS). One hundred and fifty-one patients were evaluated. The majority of patients (60%) were first evaluated by a medical oncologist while 34% were first evaluated by a hepatobiliary surgeon. Ultimately, 128 patients (85%) underwent surgical evaluation and 77% of those evaluated underwent surgical intervention. Patients who underwent operative exploration +/- debulking had less hepatic disease but also received more chemotherapy than patients not explored and those who never underwent hepatobiliary surgical evaluation. Sixty-eight patients (53%) who underwent hepatobiliary surgical evaluation underwent hepatic resection. Negative independent predictors of hepatic resection were bilobar metastases and extrahepatic disease found during exploration. Variables associated with improved DSS included: carcinoembryonic antigen level < or =200 ng/ml, node-negative primary tumor, < or =4 liver metastases, unilobar metastases, largest metastasis < or =5 cm, and hepatic resection. Five-year DSS following hepatic resection was 54%. We conclude that hepatobiliary surgical evaluation of patients with synchronous hepatic metastases is warranted since many are candidates for hepatic resection. A multidisciplinary treatment approach which combines both medical and surgical modalities may be associated with improved survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19050976     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-008-0217-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  17 in total

1.  T cell infiltrate and outcome following resection of intermediate-grade primary neuroendocrine tumours and liver metastases.

Authors:  Steven C Katz; Charan Donkor; Kristen Glasgow; Venu G Pillarisetty; Mithat Gönen; N Joseph Espat; David S Klimstra; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; William Jarnagin; Ronald P Dematteo; Murray F Brennan; Laura H Tang
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jianmin Xu; Xinyu Qin; Jianping Wang; Suzhan Zhang; Yunshi Zhong; Li Ren; Ye Wei; Shaochong Zeng; Deseng Wan; Shu Zheng
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Synchronous resection of colorectal primary and hepatic metastasis.

Authors:  Bridget N Fahy; Craig P Fischer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-03

4.  Prognostic factors associated with primary cancer in curatively resected stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Woo Yong Lee; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Surgery for perforated colorectal malignancy in an Asian population: an institution's experience over 5 years.

Authors:  Ker-Kan Tan; Choon-Chiet Hong; Junren Zhang; Jody Zhiyang Liu; Richard Sim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Impact of resection for primary colorectal cancer on outcomes in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Chol Kyoon Cho; Hyeong Rok Kim; Young Jin Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Locoregional surgical and interventional therapies for advanced colorectal cancer liver metastases: expert consensus statements.

Authors:  Eddie K Abdalla; Todd W Bauer; Yun S Chun; Michael D'Angelica; David A Kooby; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  Management of stage IV rectal cancer: palliative options.

Authors:  Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Simultaneous colorectal and hepatic procedures for colorectal cancer result in increased morbidity but equivalent mortality compared with colorectal or hepatic procedures alone: outcomes from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Osama H Hamed; Neil H Bhayani; Gail Ortenzi; Jussuf T Kaifi; Eric T Kimchi; Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll; Niraj J Gusani
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 10.  [Surgery of hepatobiliary tumors].

Authors:  U Bork; M Koch; M W Büchler; J Weitz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.