Literature DB >> 19050949

Category learning from equivalence constraints.

Rubi Hammer1, Tomer Hertz, Shaul Hochstein, Daphna Weinshall.   

Abstract

Information for category learning may be provided as positive or negative equivalence constraints (PEC/NEC)-indicating that some exemplars belong to the same or different categories. To investigate categorization strategies, we studied category learning from each type of constraint separately, using a simple rule-based task. We found that participants use PECs differently than NECs, even when these provide the same amount of information. With informative PECs, categorization was rapid, reasonably accurate and uniform across participants. With informative NECs, performance was rapid and highly accurate for only some participants. When given directions, all participants reached high-performance levels with NECs, but the use of PECs remained unchanged. These results suggest that people may use PECs intuitively, but not perfectly. In contrast, using informative NECs enables a potentially more accurate categorization strategy, but a less natural, one which many participants initially fail to implement-even in this simplified setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19050949     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-008-0243-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  26 in total

1.  Coordination of analytic and similarity-based processing strategies and expertise in dermatological diagnosis.

Authors:  C Kulatunga-Moruzi; L R Brooks; G R Norman
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  An exemplar-retrieval model of speeded same--different judgments.

Authors:  A L Cohen; R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The role of similarity in the development of categorization.

Authors:  Vladimir M. Sloutsky
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Superior single dimension relative to "exclusive or" categorization performance by a patient with category-specific visual agnosia: empirical data and an ALCOVE simulation.

Authors:  M J Dixon; D Koehler; T A Schweizer; M J Guylee
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2000 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality.

Authors:  A Tversky; I Gati
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning.

Authors:  M Levine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-03

8.  Change in pattern of ongoing cortical activity with auditory category learning.

Authors:  F W Ohl; H Scheich; W J Freeman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Human category learning.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Similarity and discrimination in human Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Annette Kinder; Harald Lachnit
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  6 in total

1.  Category learning in the context of co-presented items.

Authors:  Janet K Andrews; Kenneth R Livingston; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-11-14

2.  Semantic associative relations and conceptual processing.

Authors:  Dina Di Giacomo; Lucia Serenella De Federicis; Manuela Pistelli; Daniela Fiorenzi; Domenico Passafiume
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2011-04-05

Review 3.  What you learn is more than what you see: what can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning?

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-30

4.  Feature saliency and feedback information interactively impact visual category learning.

Authors:  Rubi Hammer; Vladimir Sloutsky; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

5.  Varying variation: the effects of within- versus across-feature differences on relational category learning.

Authors:  Katherine A Livins; Michael J Spivey; Leonidas A A Doumas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-09

6.  Impact of feature saliency on visual category learning.

Authors:  Rubi Hammer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.