Literature DB >> 19050941

Patients with cancer and e-mail: implications for clinical communication.

David Dilts1, Sheila H Ridner, Alejandro Franco, Barbara Murphy.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: The aim of this study was to collect information about cancer patients' current e-mail use and willingness to communicate with healthcare providers by e-mail.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 208 patients, undergoing treatment at a comprehensive cancer center in an urban academic medical center in southeastern USA, participated in this descriptive study. An Internet use questionnaire was developed and then used to survey patients with cancer. MAIN
RESULTS: The majority of patients indicated that e-mail would be a desirable method of clinical communication. A subset of patients would not use e-mail for clinical purposes even if they had access.
CONCLUSIONS: E-mail communication may be an acceptable form of communication among patients, nurses, and other members of the support team. Because a subset of patients will not use this form of communication, assessment of individual patient preferences for use of e-mail is indicated prior to enrolling them in an e-mail communication program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19050941     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-008-0538-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  24 in total

1.  Internet access and use among disadvantaged inner-city patients.

Authors:  C Robinson; C W Flowers; B L Alperson; K C Norris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  E-mail communications in family practice: what do patients expect?

Authors:  G R Couchman; S N Forjuoh; T G Rascoe
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 3.  Electronic patient-physician communication: problems and promise.

Authors:  K D Mandl; I S Kohane; A M Brandt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail.

Authors:  B Kane; D Z Sands
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Health literacy and cancer communication.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Mark V Williams; Estela Marin; Ruth M Parker; Jonathan Glass
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  A R Spielberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Laurence Baker; Todd H Wagner; Sara Singer; M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A survey of patient access to electronic mail: attitudes, barriers, and opportunities.

Authors:  D B Fridsma; P Ford; R Altman
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

9.  Social equity and access to the World Wide Web and E-mail: implications for design and implementation of medical applications.

Authors:  K D Mandl; S B Katz; I S Kohane
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

10.  A multi-institutional study of Internet utilization by radiation oncology patients.

Authors:  James M Metz; Pamela Devine; Albert DeNittis; Heather Jones; Margaret Hampshire; Joel Goldwein; Richard Whittington
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The role of the Internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  Nicole A Kinnane; Donna J Milne
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Technology use and its association with health and depressive symptoms in older cancer survivors.

Authors:  Hee Yun Lee; Jeehoon Kim; Monica Sharratt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Why do patients and caregivers seek answers from the Internet and online lung specialists? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Romane Milia Schook; Cilia Linssen; Franz Mnh Schramel; Jan Festen; Ernst Lammers; Egbert F Smit; Pieter E Postmus; Marjan J Westerman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Patients' reported reasons for non-use of an internet-based patient-provider communication service: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Cecilie Varsi; Deede Gammon; Torunn Wibe; Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.