Ana S Iltis1, Michael A Rie, Anji Wall. 1. Department of Health Care Ethics, St. Louis University, St Louis, Missouri, USA. iltisas@slu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The 2006 revision of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) attempts to enhance the availability of organs in part by granting new authority to organ procurement organizations over patients who are near death and may be candidates for donation after death while limiting patients' end of life (EOL) decisional authority through advance directives or surrogates. To examine the revised UAGA that may alter the ethics and law of EOL medical care in the United States. To analyze the revised UAGA in light of established legal and ethical standards. DATA SOURCES: We evaluated the 2006 UAGA and accompanying commentary. Case law and ethics literature regarding informed consent and EOL care, state laws and regulations concerning advance directives and medical licensure, and literature concerning the fiduciary obligations of physicians were reviewed and compared with the 2006 UAGA and its 2007 amendment. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We examined the legal and medical ethics literature to evaluate the 2006 UAGA and its 2007 amendment. CONCLUSIONS: The 2006 UAGA reflects the important public policy goal of making more organs available for transplantation. However, it transfers authority over EOL decisions from patients or surrogates to organ procurement organizations, which is inconsistent with EOL U.S. common law and the ethical and legal standards that govern medicine. The extent of informed consent transferred to organ procurement organizations at the time of signing a donor registry card is legally and ethically uncertain under the UAGA. As states consider enacting the 2006 UAGA, further revisions should be considered to balance the public policy goals of increasing the availability of donated organs with truly informed and voluntary EOL decisions for patients. Further revision of the 2006 UAGA is necessary to respect patients' civil liberties and the professional integrity of physicians who have legally and ethically recognized fiduciary duties to their dying patients.
OBJECTIVES: The 2006 revision of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA) attempts to enhance the availability of organs in part by granting new authority to organ procurement organizations over patients who are near death and may be candidates for donation after death while limiting patients' end of life (EOL) decisional authority through advance directives or surrogates. To examine the revised UAGA that may alter the ethics and law of EOL medical care in the United States. To analyze the revised UAGA in light of established legal and ethical standards. DATA SOURCES: We evaluated the 2006 UAGA and accompanying commentary. Case law and ethics literature regarding informed consent and EOL care, state laws and regulations concerning advance directives and medical licensure, and literature concerning the fiduciary obligations of physicians were reviewed and compared with the 2006 UAGA and its 2007 amendment. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We examined the legal and medical ethics literature to evaluate the 2006 UAGA and its 2007 amendment. CONCLUSIONS: The 2006 UAGA reflects the important public policy goal of making more organs available for transplantation. However, it transfers authority over EOL decisions from patients or surrogates to organ procurement organizations, which is inconsistent with EOL U.S. common law and the ethical and legal standards that govern medicine. The extent of informed consent transferred to organ procurement organizations at the time of signing a donor registry card is legally and ethically uncertain under the UAGA. As states consider enacting the 2006 UAGA, further revisions should be considered to balance the public policy goals of increasing the availability of donated organs with truly informed and voluntary EOL decisions for patients. Further revision of the 2006 UAGA is necessary to respect patients' civil liberties and the professional integrity of physicians who have legally and ethically recognized fiduciary duties to their dying patients.
Authors: Ali Al-Khafaji; Raghavan Murugan; Abdus S Wahed; Daniel J Lebovitz; Michael J Souter; John A Kellum Journal: Crit Care Resusc Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.159