OBJECTIVE: Hemodynamic monitoring with the pulmonary artery catheter is frequently used in the management of severe heart failure. For measurement of cardiac output (CO), transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) has recently been adopted into clinical practice as an alternative to pulmonary artery thermodilution. However, no data have been published on the comparability of the two methods for patients with severely reduced left ventricular function. Our objective was to evaluate the correlation between these two methods of CO determination in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical study. SETTING: Cardiological intermediate care unit and medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and symptoms of heart failure (New York Heart Association class III-IV). INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two methods of intermittent CO measurement were compared by simultaneously recording the results of pulmonary artery thermodilution and TPTD after injection of a cold saline bolus. Measurements were performed when clinically necessary. A total of 325 data pairs were analyzed. Mean CO of both methods was 4.4 L/min with a bias of 0.45 L/min (2 SD 1.20 L/min), resulting in a percentage error of 27.3%. CONCLUSION: In patients with severely impaired left ventricular function, measurement of CO by TPTD provides valid results.
OBJECTIVE: Hemodynamic monitoring with the pulmonary artery catheter is frequently used in the management of severe heart failure. For measurement of cardiac output (CO), transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) has recently been adopted into clinical practice as an alternative to pulmonary artery thermodilution. However, no data have been published on the comparability of the two methods for patients with severely reduced left ventricular function. Our objective was to evaluate the correlation between these two methods of CO determination in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical study. SETTING: Cardiological intermediate care unit and medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and symptoms of heart failure (New York Heart Association class III-IV). INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two methods of intermittent CO measurement were compared by simultaneously recording the results of pulmonary artery thermodilution and TPTD after injection of a cold saline bolus. Measurements were performed when clinically necessary. A total of 325 data pairs were analyzed. Mean CO of both methods was 4.4 L/min with a bias of 0.45 L/min (2 SD 1.20 L/min), resulting in a percentage error of 27.3%. CONCLUSION: In patients with severely impaired left ventricular function, measurement of CO by TPTD provides valid results.
Authors: Pierre Squara; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes; Mervyn Singer; Jean-Daniel Chiche Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-07-11 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Joachim Wilhelm; Stefan Hettwer; Markus Schuermann; Silke Bagger; Franziska Gerhardt; Sandra Mundt; Susanne Muschik; Julia Zimmermann; Sebastian Bubel; Mroawan Amoury; Thomas Kloess; Rainer Finke; Harald Loppnow; Ursula Mueller-Werdan; Henning Ebelt; Karl Werdan Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Ole Broch; Jochen Renner; Jan Höcker; Matthias Gruenewald; Patrick Meybohm; Jan Schöttler; Markus Steinfath; Berthold Bein Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Ole Broch; Jochen Renner; Matthias Gruenewald; Patrick Meybohm; Jan Schöttler; Markus Steinfath; Manu Malbrain; Berthold Bein Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2012-07-31