Literature DB >> 19049924

The wavenumber algorithm for full-matrix imaging using an ultrasonic array.

Alan J Hunter1, Bruce W Drinkwater, Paul D Wilcox.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic imaging using full-matrix capture, e.g., via the total focusing method (TFM), has been shown to increase angular inspection coverage and improve sensitivity to small defects in nondestructive evaluation. In this paper, we develop a Fourier-domain approach to full-matrix imaging based on the wavenumber algorithm used in synthetic aperture radar and sonar. The extension to the wavenumber algorithm for full-matrix data is described and the performance of the new algorithm compared with the TFM, which we use as a representative benchmark for the time-domain algorithms. The wavenumber algorithm provides a mathematically rigorous solution to the inverse problem for the assumed forward wave propagation model, whereas the TFM employs heuristic delay-and-sum beamforming. Consequently, the wavenumber algorithm has an improved point-spread function and provides better imagery. However, the major advantage of the wavenumber algorithm is its superior computational performance. For large arrays and images, the wavenumber algorithm is several orders of magnitude faster than the TFM. On the other hand, the key advantage of the TFM is its flexibility. The wavenumber algorithm requires a regularly sampled linear array, while the TFM can handle arbitrary imaging geometries. The TFM and the wavenumber algorithm are compared using simulated and experimental data.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19049924     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  8 in total

1.  Fusion of multi-view ultrasonic data for increased detection performance in non-destructive evaluation.

Authors:  Paul D Wilcox; Anthony J Croxford; Nicolas Budyn; Rhodri L T Bevan; Jie Zhang; Artem Kashubin; Peter Cawley
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.704

2.  Stolt's f-k migration for plane wave ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Damien Garcia; Louis Le Tarnec; Stéphan Muth; Emmanuel Montagnon; Jonathan Porée; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Short Range Pipe Guided Wave Testing Using SH0 Plane Wave Imaging for Improved Quantification Accuracy.

Authors:  Filip Szlaszynski; Michael J S Lowe; Peter Huthwaite
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  A sparse reconstruction algorithm for ultrasonic images in nondestructive testing.

Authors:  Giovanni Alfredo Guarneri; Daniel Rodrigues Pipa; Flávio Neves Junior; Lúcia Valéria Ramos de Arruda; Marcelo Victor Wüst Zibetti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  The detection of flaws in austenitic welds using the decomposition of the time-reversal operator.

Authors:  Laura J Cunningham; Anthony J Mulholland; Katherine M M Tant; Anthony Gachagan; Gerry Harvey; Colin Bird
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Strategies for data acquisition using ultrasonic phased arrays.

Authors:  A Velichko; A J Croxford
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Local scattering ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Alexander Velichko; Eduardo Lopez Villaverde; Anthony J Croxford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Analysis of Flaw Detection Sensitivity of Phased Array Ultrasonics in Austenitic Steel Welds According to Inspection Conditions.

Authors:  YoungLae Kim; Sungjong Cho; Ik Keun Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.