Literature DB >> 1904940

Secondary structure constraints on the evolution of Drosophila 28 S ribosomal RNA expansion segments.

A Ruiz Linares1, J M Hancock, G A Dover.   

Abstract

Eukaryotic ribosomal RNA genes contain rapidly evolving regions of unknown function termed expansion segments. We present the comparative analysis of the primary and secondary structure of two expansion segments from the large subunit rRNA gene of ten species of Drosophila and the tsetse fly species Glossina morsitans morsitans. At the primary sequence level, most of the differences observed in the sequences obtained are single base substitutions. This is in marked contrast with observations in vertebrate species in which the insertion or deletion of repetitive motifs, probably generated by a DNA-slippage mechanism, is a major factor in the evolution of these regions. The secondary structure of the two regions, supported by multiple compensatory base changes, is highly conserved between the species examined and supports the existence of a general folding pattern for all eukaryotes. Intriguingly, the evolutionary rate of expansion segments is very slow relative to other genic and non-genic regions of the Drosophila genome. These results suggest that the evolution of expansion segments in the rDNA multigene family is a balance between the homogenization of new mutations by unequal crossing over and a combination of selection against some such mutations per se and selection for subsequent compensatory mutations, in order to maintain a particular RNA secondary structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1904940     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90178-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  21 in total

1.  Novel processing in a mammalian nuclear 28S pre-rRNA: tissue-specific elimination of an 'intron' bearing a hidden break site.

Authors:  G J Melen; C G Pesce; M S Rossi; A R Kornblihtt
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  A compilation of large subunit (23S- and 23S-like) ribosomal RNA structures.

Authors:  R R Gutell; M N Schnare; M W Gray
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Is higher-order structure conserved in eukaryotic ribosomal DNA intergenic spacers?

Authors:  G D Baldridge; M W Dalton; A M Fallon
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Dropout alignment allows homology recognition and evolutionary analysis of rDNA intergenic spacers.

Authors:  Seongho Ryu; Yoonkyung Do; David H A Fitch; Won Kim; Bud Mishra
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  The contribution of DNA slippage to eukaryotic nuclear 18S rRNA evolution.

Authors:  J M Hancock
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  Divergence towards a dead end? Cleavage of the divergent domains of ribosomal RNA in apoptosis.

Authors:  G Houge; S O Døskeland
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1996-10-31

7.  Simplicity-correlated size growth of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order Isopoda.

Authors:  G B Nunn; B F Theisen; B Christensen; P Arctander
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Nucleotide sequence and presumed secondary structure of the 28S rRNA of pea aphid: implication for diversification of insect rRNA.

Authors:  D Amako; O Y Kwon; H Ishikawa
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  The sequence of 28S ribosomal RNA varies within and between human cell lines.

Authors:  H Leffers; A H Andersen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-03-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  An rRNA variable region has an evolutionarily conserved essential role despite sequence divergence.

Authors:  R Sweeney; L Chen; M C Yao
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.