Literature DB >> 19048355

Twenty years of evidence on the outcomes of malpractice claims.

Philip G Peters1.   

Abstract

Two decades of social science research on the outcomes of medical malpractice claims show malpractice outcomes bear a surprisingly good correlation with the quality of care provided to the patient as judged by other physicians. Physicians win 80% to 90% of the jury trials with weak evidence of medical negligence, approximately 70% of the borderline cases, and even 50% of the trials in cases with strong evidence of medical negligence. With only one exception, all of the studies of malpractice settlements also find a correlation between the odds of a settlement payment and the quality of care provided to the plaintiff. Between 80% and 90% of the claims rated as defensible are dropped or dismissed without payment. In addition, the amount paid in settlement drops as the strength of the patient's evidence weakens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19048355      PMCID: PMC2628515          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0631-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  12 in total

1.  Resolving malpractice disputes: imaging the jury's shadow.

Authors:  T B Metzloff
Journal:  Law Contemp Probl       Date:  1991 Winter-Spring

2.  Who are those guys? An empirical examination of medical malpractice plaintiffs' attorneys.

Authors:  Catherine T Harris; Ralph Peeples; Thomas B Metzloff
Journal:  SMU Law Rev       Date:  2005

3.  Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; Atul A Gawande; Tejal K Gandhi; Allen Kachalia; Catherine Yoon; Ann Louise Puopolo; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Identifying adverse events caused by medical care: degree of physician agreement in a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  A R Localio; S L Weaver; J R Landis; A G Lawthers; T A Brenhan; L Hebert; T J Sharp
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation.

Authors:  T A Brennan; C M Sox; H R Burstin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Standard of care and anesthesia liability.

Authors:  F W Cheney; K Posner; R A Caplan; R J Ward
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Perinatal medical negligence closed claims from the St. Paul Company, 1980-1982.

Authors:  P L Ogburn; T M Julian; D C Brooker; M S Joseph; J C Butler; P P Williams; M L Anderson; A C Shepard; S L Ogburn; W C Preisler
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 0.142

8.  An analysis of closed obstetric malpractice claims.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; A Hurst
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The influence of standard of care and severity of injury on the resolution of medical malpractice claims.

Authors:  M I Taragin; L R Willett; A P Wilczek; R Trout; J L Carson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  Beyond the standard of care: a new model to judge medical negligence.

Authors:  Lawrence H Brenner; Alison Tytell Brenner; Eric J Awerbuch; Daniel Horwitz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Medical dispute resolution, patient safety and the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  Kumaralingam Amirthalingam
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 1.858

3.  Health and life insurance as an alternative to malpractice tort law.

Authors:  Walton Sumner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Indicators for Medical Mistrust in Healthcare-A Review and Standpoint from Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Hew Hei Choy; Aniza Ismail
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-29

5.  Triggers of defensive medical behaviours: a cross-sectional study among physicians in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Erik Renkema; Kees Ahaus; Manda Broekhuis; Maria Tims
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Medical Malpractice Claims and Mitigation Strategies Following Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Keith L Jackson; Jacob Rumley; Matthew Griffith; Timothy R Linkous; Uzondu Agochukwu; John DeVine
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-07

7.  Emergency department patient safety incident characterization: an observational analysis of the findings of a standardized peer review process.

Authors:  Zach K Jepson; Chad E Darling; Kevin A Kotkowski; Steven B Bird; Michael W Arce; Gregory A Volturo; Martin A Reznek
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.