Literature DB >> 19047910

The prognostic and clinical value of morphometry and DNA cytometry in borderline ovarian tumors: a prospective study.

Marjolijn B Verbruggen1, Paul J van Diest, Jan P Baak, Mark A M Broeckaert, Peter Kenemans, René H M Verheijen.   

Abstract

To evaluate if morphometric features (mitotic activity index, volume percentage of epithelium, and DNA ploidy) are prognostic markers in borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). Ninety-three serous and mucinous consecutive BOTs diagnosed between 1989 and 2002 were studied. In all tumors, mitotic activity index, volume percentage of epithelium, and DNA ploidy were determined prospectively. Consecutively, age at diagnosis, calculated tumor volume, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and treatment by extensive staging were evaluated after a median follow-up of 52 months. Serous BOTs presented at a younger age (P<0.05), with smaller volume (P<0.001), with higher FIGO stage (P<0.001), and were more frequently bilateral (P<0.001) than mucinous BOTs. Patients with serous BOT (P<0.05) and beyond stage Ia (P<0.01) showed worse recurrence-free survival. No prognostic significance could be established for DNA ploidy or morphometry. The previously claimed prognostic power of DNA ploidy and morphometry could not be corroborated in this prospective study and can therefore not be recommended to direct clinical management in BOTs. In contrast, histologic subtype and FIGO stage seem to be stable prognosticators in BOTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19047910     DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31818131ff

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol        ISSN: 0277-1691            Impact factor:   2.762


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; Michal Zikan; Pavel Dundr; David Cibula
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-28

2.  Gross genomic alterations differ between serous borderline tumors and serous adenocarcinomas--an image cytometric DNA ploidy analysis of 307 cases with histogenetic implications.

Authors:  Manohar Pradhan; Ben Davidson; Claes Göran Tropé; Håvard Emil Danielsen; Vera Maria Abeler; Björn Risberg
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort.

Authors:  F E van Leeuwen; H Klip; T M Mooij; A M G van de Swaluw; C B Lambalk; M Kortman; J S E Laven; C A M Jansen; F M Helmerhorst; B J Cohlen; W N P Willemsen; J M J Smeenk; A H M Simons; F van der Veen; J L H Evers; P A van Dop; N S Macklon; C W Burger
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Histologic distribution of borderline ovarian tumors worldwide: a systematic review.

Authors:  Taejong Song; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.401

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.