| Literature DB >> 19047902 |
Jaume Ordi1, Sònia Garcia, Marta del Pino, Stefania Landolfi, Immaculada Alonso, Llorenç Quintó, Aureli Torné.
Abstract
To evaluate whether p16 staining could help to recognize underestimated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women positive for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) with negative biopsy. Out of 1,259 women undergoing a histologic study and a simultaneous HR-HPV detection using the Hybrid Capture 2 test, we selected all patients testing positive for HR-HPV and having a negative biopsy (n=139), as well as all women testing negative for HR-HPV with a biopsy of either CIN 1 (26 cases) or CIN 2 to 3 (11 cases). Of the remaining 1,083 women, we randomly selected for the purpose of controls, 50 cases negative for HR-HPV with negative biopsy and 100 cases positive for HR-HPV and with biopsy of CIN (50 CIN 1, 50 CIN 2-3). In all cases, immunohistochemical staining for p16 and a second evaluation of the initial biopsy was carried out. Thirty-four out of 139 biopsies (24.5%) testing positive for HR-HPV but having a negative biopsy were positive for p16. Thirty of these cases (21.6%) were classified as harboring a CIN (11 CIN 1, 19 CIN 2/3) after reevaluation. Both the number of cases reclassified as CIN of any grade, or as CIN 2/3, were significantly higher for cases with HR-HPV load above 100 relative light unit (P<0.005). Particular attention should be paid to biopsies from patients having positive Hybrid Capture 2. The risk of harboring undetected CIN of any type or CIN 2/3 is significantly higher for patients with high HR-HPV load. Immunostaining with p16 should be considered as a highly desirable addition to the histologic evaluation of cervical biopsy specimens in HR-HPV-positive women.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19047902 DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31817e9ac5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gynecol Pathol ISSN: 0277-1691 Impact factor: 2.762